🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <EMV.90May13224949@urania.math.lsa.umich.edu> emv@math.lsa.umich.edu (Edward Vielmetti) writes:
> I am curious as to what, if any, remedial actions by Apple would cause
> the GNU folks to end their boycott.
>
> It would be most interesting to see a demand for such remedial actions
> placed in front of Apple shareholders at the shareholder's meeting, along
> the lines of the proxy questions on the last IBM proxy ballot.
>
> Edward Vielmetti, U of Michigan math dept.
> emv@math.lsa.umich.edu

This sounds like an interesting idea.  Would anyone in the group (or
all of the group for that matter) be interested in coming up with such
a list?  If the demands are reasonable, I would consider putting it up
to proxy vote at the next shareholder's meeting.  I may not own much
Apple stock, but I do have a few shares (no flames please, the shares
were a gift several years ago... :-)

I suppose the big question should be, what exactly do you expect Apple
to do, and how do you think they will react to such demands?

--
Dan Rich                    | drich@dialogic.com  || ...!uunet!dialogic!drich
UNIX Systems Administrator  | "Danger, you haven't seen the last of me!"
Dialogic Corporation        |    "No, but the first of you turns my stomach!"
(201) 334-1268 x213         | -- The Firesign Theatre's Nick Danger