Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #75739Re: Free Software Users == dupes ?
From: Vincent Manis
Date: Tue, 01 May 1990 20:38
Date: Tue, 01 May 1990 20:38
41 lines
3173 bytes
3173 bytes
I'm not a lawyer, but I do find these GPL-is-unenforceable arguments extremely amusing (much as I found funny Ashton-Tate's argument that it could copyright a language: how exactly would one place an infinite set of strings into the Library of Congress). Surely the assignment of rights does not require something of value to be exchanged. Can I go into my local library, take a look at the contents and then publish them as my own? (Imagine: `Bright Lights, Big City', by Vincent Manis. `Slaves of New York', by Vincent Manis. `The Shining', by Vincent Manis. `The World According To Garp', by Vincent Manis. I could retire!) My understanding of copyright, at least under the Berne Convention, is that the author retains all rights to the work, save those s/he *explicitly* relinquishes. If somebody sends me letters, I can't publish them, without getting an explicit release. You don't even have to put a little C in a circle to get that protection. The GPL simply consists of a set of conditions under which the author permits the software to be used. This constitutes a declaration that certain rights which the author retains by default can be transferred to other people, provided that other conditions are met. Any copyright notice which states that a book's contents may not be entered into an information retrieval system represents exactly the same sort of situation. The fact that you picked up a book off the sidewalk doesn't release you from the copyright restrictions. Copyright isn't a contract. A licence is not a contract. Software licences actually comprise two parts: an assignment of rights of copyrighted material, and specific statements regarding warranty, delivery, and the like. That does bring up the validity of the Limited Warranty attached to the GPL. However, either no contract exists, in which case FSF is not liable, or a contract does exist (say if you buy a copy directly from them), in which case the Warranty applies. But none of this has anything to do with the rights to use the materials. -- \ Vincent Manis <manis@cs.ubc.ca> "There is no law that vulgarity and \ Department of Computer Science literary excellence cannot coexist." /\ University of British Columbia -- A. Trevor Hodge / \ Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1W5 (604) 228-2394
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7716@ubc-cs.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!fauern!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!samsung!uunet!van-bc!ubc-cs!manisReferences:
<2852@rex.cs.tulane.edu> <970016@gore.com> <PCG.90Apr25205938@rupert.cs.aber.ac.uk> <976:Apr2909:03:3890@stealth.acf.nyu.edu> <35894@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <4740:Apr3005:37:2290@stealth.acf.nyu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,1a1f932bc12166f3 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-05-02 12:05:01 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!fauern!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!samsung!uunet!van-bc!ubc-cs!manis From: manis@cs.ubc.ca (Vincent Manis) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Free Software Users == dupes ? Message-ID: <7716@ubc-cs.UUCP> Date: 1 May 90 20:38:10 GMT References: <2852@rex.cs.tulane.edu> <970016@gore.com> <PCG.90Apr25205938@rupert.cs.aber.ac.uk> <976:Apr2909:03:3890@stealth.acf.nyu.edu> <35894@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <4740:Apr3005:37:2290@stealth.acf.nyu.edu> Sender: news@cs.ubc.ca Reply-To: manis@cs.ubc.ca (Vincent Manis) Organization: Bucky Bits Cereal Keyboards, Ltd. Lines: 41 Posted: Tue May 1 21:38:10 1990