Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #75789Re: Free Software Users == dupes ?
From: John Coolidge
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 1990 20:23
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 1990 20:23
42 lines
3295 bytes
3295 bytes
preston@titan.rice.edu (Preston Briggs) writes: >You seem to be content to use tools given to you by >the FSF, but you are unhappy with the goals of the FSF. >You use and modify gcc, which represents a huge effort >in design, programming, distribution, and support; >but you connive to avoid publishing your own source. David Detlefs (dld@F.GP.CS.CMU.EDU) has written a good response to this that I pretty much agree with. The problem with responses like this (which are all too common, and on both sides of the discussion) is that they argue that, if one disagrees with one part of the FSF, one must surely disagree with the entirety of the FSF's goals. This is hardly the case. I agree with the goals of the FSF, even more than they seem to themselves. I'm working on building free software. I've modified Gnu programs, and I distribute them with full source. In short, I'm a model user of Gnu software. I follow both the spirit and the letter of the GPL, even though I think it's a flawed document, because that seems to be the right thing to do right now. However, I _do_ think the GPL is flawed, and I'm not afraid to say it, even though it may cost me something (the enmity of some elements in the FSF). I think free software is a good enough idea that it doesn't need complicated, and legally problematical, licenses to protect it. I think that the number of people who will abuse free software by building un-free products with it will do less harm than the GPL does now by scaring off some people and offending others. I think that some of the arguments about libg++, and header files, and linking in general, lead uncomfortably far down the path of software interface copyrights (or look and feel copyrights on code). I think the FSF shows a disturbing tendancy to forgo long-term goals and ignore ethics in order to pursue their short-term goals. I'd like to see this changed, and so I argue. My dedication is to the goals of free software, not to the FSF or any other entity. --John -------------------------------------------------------------------------- John L. Coolidge Internet:coolidge@cs.uiuc.edu UUCP:uiucdcs!coolidge Of course I don't speak for the U of I (or anyone else except myself) Copyright 1990 John L. Coolidge. Copying allowed if (and only if) attributed. You may redistribute this article if and only if your recipients may as well.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Mar30.202353.25750@brutus.cs.uiuc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!coolidgeReferences:
<2449@sunset.MATH.UCLA.EDU> <970010@gore.com> <NELSON.90Mar27220308@image.clarkson.edu> <1990Mar28.045234.27003@brutus.cs.uiuc.edu> <MIKE.90Mar28135129@turing.cs.unm.edu> <804@eedsp.eedsp.gatech.edu> <6176@brazos.Rice.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,1a1f932bc12166f3 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-03-30 12:23:53 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!coolidge From: coolidge@casca.cs.uiuc.edu (John Coolidge) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Free Software Users == dupes ? Message-ID: <1990Mar30.202353.25750@brutus.cs.uiuc.edu> Date: 30 Mar 90 20:23:53 GMT References: <2449@sunset.MATH.UCLA.EDU> <970010@gore.com> <NELSON.90Mar27220308@image.clarkson.edu> <1990Mar28.045234.27003@brutus.cs.uiuc.edu> <MIKE.90Mar28135129@turing.cs.unm.edu> <804@eedsp.eedsp.gatech.edu> <6176@brazos.Rice.edu> Sender: news@brutus.cs.uiuc.edu Reply-To: coolidge@cs.uiuc.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: U of Illinois, CS Dept., Systems Research Group Lines: 42 Posted: Fri Mar 30 21:23:53 1990