🚀 go-pugleaf

Bob Sutterfield writes:
 > However, it quickly became apparent that new sites weren't going to be
 > consistent in adding that line to their mailpaths.  News distributions
 > spread by word-of-mouth, and there were growing pockets of gnu.*
 > connectivity that simply hadn't heard that they should do that.

I don't see this as a problem, since postings to moderated GNU groups
would FAIL until the necessary mailpaths line was added.  This would
serve as incentive for laggards to get their act together.  Sending a
monthly "newgroup <group> moderated" (one for each moderated GNU group)
to the gnu distribution would make sure that new sites had the correct
groups marked moderated.  (It also would stir up a lot of ire until
leaks in the GNU distribution were plugged. :))