🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Sep1.180222.20077@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee) writes:
>In article <1992Sep1.130800.14354@news.acns.nwu.edu> learn@speedy.acns.nwu.edu (William J. Vajk) writes:
>>>First, it does not affect "all of us."  
>>I am once again dismayed at the responses made by supposedly
>>intelligent individuals to affairs which do indeed affect all
>>of us. Perhaps some people simply don't se the connections.
>
>An article about voting for a particular presidential candidate affects all of
>us too.  Even if you're not a US citizen or resident, the US has enough
>world-wide influence that which president is elected is probably going to have
>some indirect on you.  Should such an article be posted to a thousand-odd
>newsgroups?
>
>Anyone can get heart disease.  Should I post articles about cholesterol in
>gnu.misc.discuss because it affects "all of us" and so can go to every
>newsgroup on the net?

And AMWAY salesmen, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mutlu, all feel that
everyone should hear what THEY have to say.  (Fortunately, so far, only
Mutlu has therefore decided to post everywhere - William, do you really
want to join Mutlu as net.pest?)

The Rhealist - Rheal Nadeau - nadeau@bnr.ca - Speaking only for myself