Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72746Re: Too Good to be True?
From: Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1992 06:30
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1992 06:30
41 lines
2536 bytes
2536 bytes
mathew@mantis.co.uk (en font terrible) writes: >I don't use GNU products unless there is no alternative. However, I feel >obliged to point out that if people who spend their time writing GNU >software were to spend their time writing free software instead, everyone >could benefit. I know everybody else is commenting on this paragraph, but just to throw in a real life example: The NOS (KA9Q) TCP/IP program is not under the GPL. Alpha Micro (an obscure computer company which makes computers which run a proprietary operating system, AMOS) ported it to their system. They released an executable version only, without source. Their version had several annoying bugs in it (it crashed after an hour or so, for example, requiring the system to be rebooted (this is less painful than rebooting under Unix, but more painful than MS-DOS)). Reported bugs were simply filed, since they weren't interested in pushing the program. I was finally able to talk them into giving me the source as a test case for my port of gcc which they were considering distributing (they are, in fact, now distributing it as the standard compiler). I was able to fix all the bugs snatching a few hours here and there, and have added several new features (mostly AMOS specific). NOS is a great program, but I suffered because it was not put under the GPL (and because Alpha Micro was stupid, but most computer companies seem to be). Since I gave my fixes back to Alpha Micro, everybody who used it suffered until I got the source. When you're discussing libraries or something like BISON, there are problems with the GNU License; I personally support it, but I somewhat sympathize with the counterarguments as well. When you're discussing general utility programs, I think the GPL beats public domain hands down. -- Ian Taylor ian@airs.com uunet!airs!ian First person to identify this quote wins a free e-mail message: ``Hagenbeck sent a special expedition to Lake Bangweolo; unfortunately this expedition did not even find the lake.''
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3285@airs.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!airs!ianReferences:
<iRNaeB6w164w@mantis.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,e71af1b1f401c58d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-09 22:58:02 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!airs!ian From: ian@airs.com (Ian Lance Taylor) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Too Good to be True? Message-ID: <3285@airs.com> Date: 10 Jan 92 06:30:33 GMT References: <iRNaeB6w164w@mantis.co.uk> Sender: news@airs.com Lines: 41