Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #74065Re: Your chance of the year to change software patent law
From: Rich Braun
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 1991 17:40
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 1991 17:40
18 lines
1475 bytes
1475 bytes
My letter to the Patent and Trade Office went out at lunchtime today. The thrust of my comments was not only that ideas and algorithms should not be patentable, but also that _interfaces_ should not be patentable. I cited the example of DEC's "BI" bus, which forced competitors to abandon the DEC add-on board market in favor of lousy-performing Ethernet interfaces. Other examples of interfaces are GUIs, data file storage formats, network protocols, command languages, and programming languages. In general, the concept of "interface", whether for human or machine use, should not be patentable or copyrightable. I also made a distinction between "significant" text and artwork vs. "look and feel" for purposes of copyright infringement claims. A box, menu, or shading on a screen simply should not be copyrightable, let alone patentable. I urge others to make these points to the PTO. -rich
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8247@spdcc.SPDCC.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!bu.edu!spdcc!rbraunReferences:
<28540.Jul821.11.4091@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <149276@unix.cis.pitt.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,d408f986ed8d41f3 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-07-09 14:12:56 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!bu.edu!spdcc!rbraun From: rbraun@spdcc.COM (Rich Braun) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Your chance of the year to change software patent law Message-ID: <8247@spdcc.SPDCC.COM> Date: 9 Jul 91 17:40:53 GMT References: <28540.Jul821.11.4091@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <149276@unix.cis.pitt.edu> Organization: Kronos Inc., Waltham, Mass. Lines: 18