Article View: gnu.utils.bug
Article #1121oleo 1.0
From: Karl Berry
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 06:47
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 06:47
19 lines
1146 bytes
1146 bytes
oleo 1.0's configure.in doesn't include the check for AC_ISC_POSIX. This makes it not get the POSIX features in ISC 2.2.1. Perhaps some of the other variant checks should be included as well. Also, io_term.c fails to compile on ISC 2.2.1 with gcc 2.3.1, because it uses the identifiers TRUE, ERR, and FALSE, and doesn't define them. Also, the clean targets seem confused: clean shouldn't remove parse.tab.c; distclean should depend on clean, and (perhaps) not remove core; realclean should depend on distclean, and remove parse.tab.c. Also, Makefile.in should say exec_prefix = $(prefix) instead of /usr/local, so that changes to $(prefix) will be reflected in $(exec_prefix) by default. There is no NEWS file.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<199211201647.AA03053@claude.cs.umb.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!claude.cs.umb.edu!karlShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: gnu.utils.bug Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!claude.cs.umb.edu!karl From: karl@claude.cs.umb.edu (Karl Berry) Subject: oleo 1.0 Message-ID: <199211201647.AA03053@claude.cs.umb.edu> Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu Reply-To: karl@cs.umb.edu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Distribution: gnu Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 06:47:33 GMT Approved: bug-gnu-utils@prep.ai.mit.edu Lines: 20