🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <920@tukki.jyu.fi> I wrote about problems in porting
Gnu e?grep to MS-DOS.  It turned out I hadn't found them all:
It still failed with certain regexps.  It didn't crash, just gave
wrong results, making the bug much harder to track down.

At this point it fortunately occurred me that using large data model
wasn't really necessary after all - the "Memory exhausted" problem
with small model was only the result of the erroneous test described
in my previous posting.  And indeed, after compiling with small model 
I got perfect results every time.  So I could hunt the bug in large
data model by tracing the versions side by side.

The problem was in regex.c, which presumably has been written when
compilers that violate its assumptions were but a dream in some
ANSI-committee-member-to-be's mind.  Actually, there were two
related problems:

One, the code assumes that the result of subtracting pointers is
an int.  According to pANS as well as TurboC, it is ptrdiff_t --
and in large data models the latter defines it as long.

Two, occasionally 0 (zero) is passed as a pointer argument without
cast, which I think is valid only when ints and pointers are of the
same size and the representation of null pointer is (int)0.
(If NULL had been used, it would've worked with Turbo C as it
defines NULL as 0L in large data models, but that is something
of a kludge, and might fail with some other compiler.)

Both had the effect of passing 4-byte values to functions
expecting 2-byte ones, with predictable results.

To fix these I changed most ints in regex.c and a few in grep.c
into ptrdiff_t and added casts where necessary (and probably some
that strictly aren't), including ptrdiff_t type constants.

To maintain compatibility with pre-ANSI compilers I added
#ifndef __STDC__
  typedef int ptrdiff_t;
#endif

It is perhaps worth noting that with ANSI-style prototypes
these problems would not have occurred in the first place.

I _think_ there are no more bugs left, but I'll experiment a little
yet to make sure.

By the way, what is the recommended place for sending ports of Gnu
stuff like this - I mean if there are no bugs (for which this group is
for), only things like different #include's or makefile?  Where should
I send the diffs for this & TC makefile once I'm satisfied with the
thing?

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen                 BitNet:    tarvainen@finjyu
Internet:  tarvainen@jylk.jyu.fi  -- OR --  tarvaine@tukki.jyu.fi