Article View: gnu.utils.bug
Article #982Latest GNU versions? [was: GNU tar-1.11 problems]
From: Bob Proulx
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 11:31
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 11:31
48 lines
2615 bytes
2615 bytes
Michael writes: > GNU maintainers generally don't have time to figure out which bugs > have been fixed by the latest release and which have not--so save > us the trouble, and don't send in bug reports for old versions of > programs. Francois Pinard writes: > It is *preferable* to send bug reports for latest versions, I agree. > However, we should not make this a must. All bug reports should be > welcome, whatever the version they apply to. Thank you! I had felt that I had been unjustly rebuked! I had prepared a very flameful response, but then let it sit unmailed while I cooled down. If nothing else this short note from Francois has done some good PR for the FSF with me. > No user should fear reporting problems with GNU products, or feel Which is exactly what I felt after getting that response. I had pulled tar-1.11 just a few days before. It *was* the newest and most current version at that time. And it looks like 1.11.1 was released almost immediately after that! On prep.ai.mit.edu:~/pub/gnu/ -rw-r--r-- 1 14910 wheel 280367 Sep 15 19:46 tar-1.11.1.tar.Z So I thought I *did* have the latest version but figured that since the problems were pretty obvious that there must be something better cooking somewhere. (Notice from my bug report that I did ask if there was a newer version. I was thinking of the maintainers current copy, however. :-) I also offered to supply patches to fix the problems that I had found. I want brownie points for that. :-) I was previously unaware of the news group gnu.utils.bug or I would have known about the release of the newer version while I was debugging the old one. I will keep an eye on it from now on. Simple pointers like the one I got to look in that news group go a long way! I might suggest putting that in the README file which is where I got the bug-gnu-utils@prep.ai.mit.edu address. I am not sure where it goes, probably to thousands, so please pardon the intrusion everyone. Meanwhile, keep up the good work! Bob Proulx "Testing out 1.11.1" rwp@fc.hp.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9209302331.AA08735@hprwp.fc.hp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!convex!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!hprwp.fc.hp.com!rwpReferences:
<9209301951.AA00432@icule.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: gnu.utils.bug Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!convex!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!hprwp.fc.hp.com!rwp From: rwp@hprwp.fc.hp.com (Bob Proulx) Subject: Latest GNU versions? [was: GNU tar-1.11 problems] Message-ID: <9209302331.AA08735@hprwp.fc.hp.com> Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet References: <9209301951.AA00432@icule.UUCP> Distribution: gnu Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 11:31:18 GMT Approved: bug-gnu-utils@prep.ai.mit.edu Lines: 49