Thread View: gnu.utils.bug
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by peter c halverson
Fri, 11 Sep 1992 19:28
segmentation in imageto (?)
Author: peter c halverson
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 19:28
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 19:28
66 lines
2679 bytes
2679 bytes
[more a question than a bug report, because it's not clear whether imageto
is expected to handle the following...]
Is imageto supposed to be able to separate glyphs that overlap in one
dimension? I know it can't handle 2D overlap (where images actually
touch), but an image like
XXXX YYYYYYY
XXXX YYY
XXXXXXXXX YYY
XXXXXXXXX YYY
XXXX YYY
XXXX YYYYYYY
is yielding glyphs
XXXX
XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
XXXX
XXXX
and
YYYYYYY
YYY
XXX YYY
XXX YYY
YYY
YYYYYYY
namely the "left" glyph is correct, but the "right" glyph includes those
portions of the former which are contain in the latter's bounding box. Am
I doing something wrong, or is this a known deficiency in imageto? If the
latter, I would think it would be a real pain to deal with italic/slanted
faces, which probably overlap BB's a lot...
I'm also getting some (related?) oddities for the two double quote glyphs.
It's kind of hard to describe in ASCII (I can try and isolate the bits in
question if you want to see them), but IMG data something like
xx xx
xx yx
xxx zyx
xxxxx zyxxx
xxxxxx zyxxxx
xxxx yxxx
is being converted by imageto into a GF char looking like
xx xx
xx x y
xxx x zy
xxxxx xxx zy
xxxxxx xxxx zy
xxxx xxx y
i.e. part of the left side of the rightmost segment is getting moved to the
right side. The rightdblquote is similarly afflicted, but no others. I've
noticed that when running -verbose, imageto outputs a plus-sign ("+") in
front of just these two id's; no others. What's the meaning of the plus
sign? Are these two segmentation problems related?
thanks for any help you can offer,
Pete
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads