🚀 go-pugleaf

no reply

     Es folgt  eine Liste  eventuell  fehlgeschlagener  Reflektormails
von reflector@hactar.hanse.de.

### Returned Mail
### Org-To: df4j@br0.hrz.th-darmstadt.de
### Org-ID: <25ccd8INNic9@rs18.hrz.th-darmstadt.de>
> From: <UCX_SMTP@br0.hrz.th-darmstadt.de>
> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 93 20:48:13 +0200
> 
>
> 
> ---- Transcript of session follows ----
> 
> %MAIL-E-USERSPEC, invalid user specification '@HRZPUB.TH-DARMSTADT.DE'-NONAME-F-NOMSG, Message number 0013BC0C
> 
> ---- Recipients of this delivery ----
> 
> <df4j@br0.hrz.th-darmstadt.de> (bounced)
> 
> 
> ---- Unsent message follows ----

### Returned Mail
### Org-To: (not available)
### Org-ID: (not available)
> From: Postmaster@fhg.de
> Date: 25 Aug 93 20:54:21+0100
> 
>
> Your message had been relayed through an X.400 network, which has issued
> a "delivery report". The syntax of these reports had been devised to
> fit the needs of X.400 user software; it is a terse binary structure.
> Our gateway is making its best effort to present this information in an
> understandable manner; we apology for its esoteric structure.
> 
> The report contains information on the following recipients:
> 
> <zahn@alpha.ipk.fhg.D400.de>: Transfer failure.
> Loop detected (Report that bug to your postmaster).
> 
> Before meeting its fate, your message had been forwarded through
> the X.400 network, as indicated by the following traces:
> 
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 20:54:21+0100
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=d400/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 18:52:08 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 20:53:59+0100
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=d400/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 18:51:42 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 20:53:33+0100
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=d400/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 18:51:19 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 20:53:09+0100
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=d400/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 18:50:56 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 20:52:45+0100
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=d400/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 18:50:30 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 20:52:20+0100
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=d400/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 18:50:06 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 20:47:28+0100
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=d400/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 18:45:14 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 20:47:06+0100
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=d400/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 18:44:56 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 20:46:37+0100
> X400-Received: by /ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 25 Aug 93 20:46:36+0200
> 
> By chance, we have been able to extract from the X.400 network a copy
> of your original message. Some fields may look strange, as they have
> been converted back and forth, but we hope that the information will
> be useful. Here is your original message:
> 
> Date: 25 Aug 93 20:46:36+0200
> From: reflector@hactar.Hanse.de
> To: zahn@alpha.ipk.fhg.dbp.de,
> 	zahn@alpha.ipk.fhg.dbp.de
> Message-ID: <9308251846.AA14637@fhg.de>
> Organization: FHG
> 
> 	  from lutzifer.hanse.de (134.100.239.2) with smtp
> 	  id <m0oVPqX-0000XxC>; Wed, 25 Aug 93 20:45 MEST
> Received: from hactar.hanse.de by lutzifer.hanse.de with SMTP id AA14442
>   (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <@lutzifer:zahn@alpha.ipk.fhg.de>); Wed, 25 Aug 1993 20:36:57 +0200
> 	  (Amiga1.02l10*hactar-123r) for zahn@alpha.ipk.fhg.de
> 	  id <m0oVOqI-0002Nsf@hactar.Hanse.DE>; Wed, 25 Aug 1993 17:41:06 UTC
> Reply-To: postmaster@hactar.hanse.de (Posthamster of hactar.hanse.de)
> Message-Id: <m0oVOqI-0002Nsf@hactar.Hanse.DE>
> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1993 19:40:59 MES-02
> From: reflector@hactar.hanse.de (Daemon for group de.test)
> To: zahn@alpha.ipk.fhg.de (Matthias Zahn)
> Cc: reflector.sent@hactar.hanse.de
> Subject: received your article
> 
> Moin Matthias Zahn,
> 
> this is an automagic reply for newsgroup de.test.
> 
> Your Article       <zahn.746192663@alpha.ipk.fhg.de>
> with the Subject  "Test",
> posting date       24 Aug 93 11:44:23 GMT, has been
> received here on   Wed, 25 Aug 1993 19:40:58 MES-02, after covering the
> following Path:   "hactar!abqhh!lutzifer!news.rrz.uni-hamburg.de!news.dkrz.de!rzsun2.informatik.uni-hamburg.de!news.dfn.de!zib-berlin.de!mailgzrz.TU-Berlin.DE!ceres.fokus.gmd.de!gmdtub!sunplt!alpha.ipk.fhg.de!zahn".
> Size of header     485 Bytes,
> size of body       296 Bytes.
> 
> Your complete, unaltered article follows right after this:
> ---cut---
> Path: hactar!abqhh!lutzifer!news.rrz.uni-hamburg.de!news.dkrz.de!rzsun2.informatik.uni-hamburg.de!news.dfn.de!zib-berlin.de!mailgzrz.TU-Berlin.DE!ceres.fokus.gmd.de!gmdtub!sunplt!alpha.ipk.fhg.de!zahn
> From: zahn@alpha.ipk.fhg.de (Matthias Zahn)
> Newsgroups: de.test
> Subject: Test
> Summary: Test
> Keywords: Test
> Message-ID: <zahn.746192663@alpha.ipk.fhg.de>
> Date: 24 Aug 93 11:44:23 GMT
> Sender: usenet@sunplt.ipk.fhg.de
> Organization: IPK-Berlin, Fraunhofer Gesellschaft, Germany
> Lines: 8
> 
> Na, wollen wir mal sehen, ob die Mail mit der Adresse ankommt.
> 
> 
> --
> *** Important ***     Due to X400 problems *don't* hit 'r' for reply!
>                       Reply to:  Matthias.Zahn@ipk.fhg.de
> Not important         Matthias Zahn, Berlin-Tempelhof, Germany
>                       Wuerg on IRC
> ---cut---
> 
> No reply would have been sent if you would have included at least one of
> the following keywords _anywhere_ in your article:
> 
[...]

### Returned Mail
### Org-To: (not available)
### Org-ID: (not available)
> From: Postmaster@fhg.de
> Date: 26 Aug 93 02:58:37+0100
> 
>
> Your message had been relayed through an X.400 network, which has issued
> a "delivery report". The syntax of these reports had been devised to
> fit the needs of X.400 user software; it is a terse binary structure.
> Our gateway is making its best effort to present this information in an
> understandable manner; we apology for its esoteric structure.
> 
> The report contains information on the following recipients:
> 
> <rang@alpha.ipk.fhg.D400.de>: Transfer failure.
> Loop detected (Report that bug to your postmaster).
> 
> Before meeting its fate, your message had been forwarded through
> the X.400 network, as indicated by the following traces:
> 
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 02:58:37+0100
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=d400/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 00:56:22 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 02:58:13+0100
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=d400/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 00:56:00 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 02:57:51+0100
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=d400/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 00:55:36 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 02:57:28+0100
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=d400/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 00:55:13 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 02:57:03+0100
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=d400/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 00:54:49 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 02:56:41+0100
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=d400/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 00:54:26 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 02:56:17+0100
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=d400/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 00:54:01 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 02:55:53+0100
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=d400/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 00:53:41 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 02:55:22+0100
> X400-Received: by /ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 26 Aug 93 02:55:21+0200
> 
> By chance, we have been able to extract from the X.400 network a copy
> of your original message. Some fields may look strange, as they have
> been converted back and forth, but we hope that the information will
> be useful. Here is your original message:
> 
> Date: 26 Aug 93 02:55:21+0200
> From: reflector@hactar.Hanse.de
> To: rang@alpha.ipk.fhg.dbp.de,
> 	rang@alpha.ipk.fhg.dbp.de
> Message-ID: <9308260055.AA10115@fhg.de>
> Organization: FHG
> 
> 	  from lutzifer.hanse.de (134.100.239.2) with smtp
> 	  id <m0oVVbW-0000Y4C>; Thu, 26 Aug 93 02:54 MEST
> Received: from hactar.hanse.de by lutzifer.hanse.de with SMTP id AA24721
>   (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <@lutzifer:rang@alpha.ipk.fhg.de>); Thu, 26 Aug 1993 02:42:10 +0200
> 	  (Amiga1.02l10*hactar-123r) for rang@alpha.ipk.fhg.de
> 	  id <m0oVTkT-0002NzH@hactar.Hanse.DE>; Wed, 25 Aug 1993 22:55:24 UTC
> Reply-To: postmaster@hactar.hanse.de (Posthamster of hactar.hanse.de)
> Message-Id: <m0oVTkT-0002NzH@hactar.Hanse.DE>
> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1993 00:55:11 MES-02
> From: reflector@hactar.hanse.de (Daemon for group de.test)
> To: rang@alpha.ipk.fhg.de (Cris Circle)
> Cc: reflector.sent@hactar.hanse.de
> Subject: received your article
> 
> Moin Cris Circle,
> 
> this is an automagic reply for newsgroup de.test.
> 
> Your Article       <rang.746209155@alpha.ipk.fhg.de>
> with the Subject  "TEST TEST TEST TEST HOHO HOHO HOHO HUMPF HUMPF HUMPF",
> posting date       24 Aug 93 16:19:15 GMT, has been
> received here on   Thu, 26 Aug 1993 00:55:08 MES-02, after covering the
> following Path:   "hactar!wolfhh!lutzifer!news.rrz.uni-hamburg.de!rzsun2.informatik.uni-hamburg.de!news.dfn.de!zib-berlin.de!mailgzrz.TU-Berlin.DE!gmdtub!sunplt!alpha.ipk.fhg.de!rang".
> Size of header     471 Bytes,
> size of body       224 Bytes.
> 
> Your complete, unaltered article follows right after this:
> ---cut---
> Path: hactar!wolfhh!lutzifer!news.rrz.uni-hamburg.de!rzsun2.informatik.uni-hamburg.de!news.dfn.de!zib-berlin.de!mailgzrz.TU-Berlin.DE!gmdtub!sunplt!alpha.ipk.fhg.de!rang
> From: rang@alpha.ipk.fhg.de (Cris Circle)
> Newsgroups: de.test
> Subject: TEST TEST TEST TEST HOHO HOHO HOHO HUMPF HUMPF HUMPF
> Message-ID: <rang.746209155@alpha.ipk.fhg.de>
> Date: 24 Aug 93 16:19:15 GMT
> Sender: usenet@sunplt.ipk.fhg.de
> Organization: IPK-Berlin, Fraunhofer Gesellschaft, Germany
> Lines: 9
> 
> humpf.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> panic: user's intelligence insufficient to edit .signature file
> system going down in -10 seconds because of previous error
> panic: impossible to go down when t=0 is not in future
> don't know what to do now. Stop.
> ---cut---
> 
> No reply would have been sent if you would have included at least one of
> the following keywords _anywhere_ in your article:
> 
>    "control: ", "no reply", "no replies", "ignore", "keine replies",
>    "keine antwort", "keine rueckmeldung".
> 
[...]


--
     Fragen, Kommentare  usw.  bitte  an  den  Verantwortlichen fuer dieses
Posting (vgl. Reply-To:).  Dieser Artikel  wurde  maschinell  erstellt,  er
traegt daher weder Unterschrift noch Siegel.

 Mail->News Gateway: Mail an <news.gruppe%news.local@hactar.hanse.de> bzw.
                             <news.gruppe@news.hactar.sub.org> (Subnet)