Article View: hepnet.videoconf
Article #10Re: Which is the best kit of video conference?
From: Al & Linda
Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 00:00
Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 00:00
44 lines
3048 bytes
3048 bytes
Tom�s Palacios Guti�rrez wrote in message <35557463.386766@news.jet.es>... > Thank you for reading this message. I have a 200MHz Pentium >with Windows 95 and I want to buy a camera to make video conferences >with programs like NetMeeting or VDOPhone. But I have some doubts >about which one is the best (between the cameras cheaper than 350$), > Tomas, I have bought and installed three different systems under $300 US. They are the "Connectix VC Parallel camera", the "Intel Create and Share PCI capture board and camera system", and a "Winnov Desktop capture card and camera system". The Connectix was $100 US after the rebate, the Intel and Winnov systems cost around $300 US when I bought each. All were installed on 200 MHz systems, two are MMX boxes, and one is not, and all are running Windows 95. If you want inexpensive, with reasonable performance, the Connectix VC certainly worked fine. A much better solution is the capture card. You will get better performance, no doubt. The downside is they tend to cost more. I installed the Intel system on one of my stepsons systems. The video I receive from him is very clear. He is on a 28.8 Kbps modem. The Connectix video I receive from another stepson is also very clear, he is on a 33.6 Kbps modem. I have the Winnov system on my 200 MHz MMX box, and receive very clear video when I video conference from work. In that case the link is cable modem at home, and high speed network at work. Another solution is if you own a video camcorder. My brother hooks his camcorder into his ATI-All-In-Wonder card. I receive the best video from him of all the conferences I do. You can buy a Winnov Videum VO card for around $100 US, I think, and simply hook up a camcorder. Or you can get a Winnov Videum AV card and have video and audio synchronized. I am not sure of the cost for the VO card. I never had to deal with Connectix tech support or Intel tech support, so I can not say how they respond to requests for help. Winnov has been very responsive the two times I have asked questions. Those are my experiences...hope some of this helps... Al
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6j41s4$m08$1@ha2.rdc1.md.home.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<35557463.386766@news.jet.es>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 112138,5d893c214c780522 X-Google-Attributes: gid112138,public X-Google-Thread: fa2a6,5d893c214c780522 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa2a6,public X-Google-Thread: ffa71,5d893c214c780522 X-Google-Attributes: gidffa71,public X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,5d893c214c780522 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public X-Google-Thread: 101647,5d893c214c780522 X-Google-Attributes: gid101647,public From: "Al & Linda @Home" <ajarvi@home.com> Subject: Re: Which is the best kit of video conference? Date: 1998/05/10 Message-ID: <6j41s4$m08$1@ha2.rdc1.md.home.com> X-Deja-AN: 351921497 References: <35557463.386766@news.jet.es> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Organization: @Home Network Newsgroups: hepnet.videoconf,aus.comms.videocon,comp.dcom.videoconf,hannover.uni.videoconf,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video