🚀 go-pugleaf

Halifax_Hooligan wrote:
> On Jun 5, 10:31 am, "Rick Walker" <R...@WR.com> wrote:
>> <jfkdh...@irujti.mcfdhf> wrote:
>>> they are actually throwing that muck at the lowly taxpayer instead and
>>> that's why their strategy is backfiring and the ndp percentage points keep
>>> rising. it fumed me to see the pcs run to the ethics people with a formal
>>> complaint against the ndp. to me, that wrote "sleaze" all over them. can
>>> the tories get any lower? they can't win the election on their crappy
>>> record so they have to muck rake the ndp to try to steal the election.
>> Good thing they don't have a hope in hell - I agree with a lot of things you
>> said.  To see Rodney saying, "What about the 5 thousand, Darrell?" bugged me
>> too... how many thousands, even hundreds of thousands of dollars has the PC
>> party under the MacDonald government stolen from us or "lost?"
>>
>> Dexter did the right thing returning the money - I'm sure Rodney wouldn't
>> have given it back.  And who knows how much the PCs have received in
>> "questionable funding."  That's something we'll never know.
>>
>>     - Rick
> 
> The thing about the $5000 was that it was from the umbrella
> organization, so it fell within the rules.
> The $45K that was returned was questionable, if the umbrella
> organization planned to reimburse the member unions. Luckily for
> Rodney , some voters are generally uninformed and only listen to the
> party message. Those that choose to dig around and look for the truth
> aren't fooled by him.
> 
> Now do I think the NDP would have returned the money if they were'nt
> found out, probably not, but neither would the othe rparties.

And didn't the same umbrella organization give money to the PCs as well 
as the NDPs last year?

Joni