Article View: hfx.general
Article #139971Re: crazy driver vs angry pedestrian lic# ERB 455 or ERB 445.
From: jackimo
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:56
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:56
11 lines
2489 bytes
2489 bytes
Let this topic be a lesson to all the sensible people out there - that there sure are some crazy people driving around out there (and posting here). Even worse they actually try and justify it. If you hit a pedestrian at a crosswalk you will be at fault it's very, very simple. Why don't you consider another senario ... you're driving up to a green light and bam some guy drives straight though a red light and kills you. Is it the dead guys fault for not considering the fact that the other driver may not be paying attention and yield right of way? How is this situation any different than the pedestrian? The pedestrian had the right of way and the van wasn't yeilding, granted the stakes are higher being on foot.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<486d9541-95fd-450f-aa8a-a95e9a20a99c@o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<dc5e46ce-f8e6-40af-9d34-b6e1a6ae6a16@o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> <h0391n$pa1$4@news.datemas.de> <dxqDvDOd2l4F-pn2-RWdS5EMdSU5k@localhost> <h04j1a$t1j$3@news.datemas.de> <dxqDvDOd2l4F-pn2-viWgeJQjcJps@localhost> <h05k1g$82r$3@news.datemas.de> <6041d584-52b7-4bbc-a42c-fe2bf2145a25@h23g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <h07da8$r56$7@news.datemas.de> <e2bb7df9-8586-425d-ac0d-0c19c4ed533b@o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 48560ea9d0,88759ed64e4bc68c X-Google-Attributes: gid48560ea9d0,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: jackimo@gmail.com Newsgroups: hfx.general Subject: Re: crazy driver vs angry pedestrian lic# ERB 455 or ERB 445. Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 06:56:53 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 11 Message-ID: <486d9541-95fd-450f-aa8a-a95e9a20a99c@o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> References: <dc5e46ce-f8e6-40af-9d34-b6e1a6ae6a16@o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> <h0391n$pa1$4@news.datemas.de> <dxqDvDOd2l4F-pn2-RWdS5EMdSU5k@localhost> <h04j1a$t1j$3@news.datemas.de> <dxqDvDOd2l4F-pn2-viWgeJQjcJps@localhost> <h05k1g$82r$3@news.datemas.de> <6041d584-52b7-4bbc-a42c-fe2bf2145a25@h23g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <h07da8$r56$7@news.datemas.de> <e2bb7df9-8586-425d-ac0d-0c19c4ed533b@o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 142.239.254.20 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1244123813 24917 127.0.0.1 (4 Jun 2009 13:56:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=142.239.254.20; posting-account=U9keDQoAAAAF5Pl8fd8q6pfB2eQ2Wyzh User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; GTB6; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; MS-RTC LM 8; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)