Article View: hfx.general
Article #139998Re: Eastlink vs Bell Aliant - who has the best bundle nowadays?
From: thparkth
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:29
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:29
54 lines
3783 bytes
3783 bytes
> They DO say they're faster though as part of their sales pitch. Then > when you ask them how they compare to Eastlink's Extreme 15, they say > NO ONE is that fast. I have speed tests that say they do get that fast > or very close to it. In fact the majority of Eastlink Internet users get exactly the rated speed of the connection (minus a few percent for packet overhead). Whereas the majority of DSL customers (for any DSL ISP, anywhere on the planet) get only a fraction of the rated speed. The reason is simple - even a shoddily installed, age-degraded coax cable is a pretty good, wideband, low-loss communications medium, whereas even a perfectly installed, brand new copper telephone pair is pretty crap for anything above a few Mbit/sec. There are techniques which push the envelope on how much data you can get over a copper pair, but the key thing to understand is that these really are pushing the limits of what's possible. Some places (Korea famously) offer gigabit-class service over DSL, but that requires high population density and a DSLAM in every apartment block. Not happening in Nova Scotia any time soon. Whereas even at 15 Mbit/sec, high speed Internet is a tiny fraction of the available bandwidth of a coax cable. http://www.dslreports.com/archive/eastlink.ca http://www.dslreports.com/archive/aliant.net If you compare the results of the two ISPs on the dslreports site, you'll see that Eastlink users are getting higher average speeds than Aliant users. No surprise. In fact, if you look at the graphs, most Eastlink users are getting results higher than 10MBit/sec, whereas no Aliant user has got a result over 6.5 Mbit/sec. (Remember Eastlink has customers on 10 and 15 Mbit/sec rated; Aliant has customers on 1.5, 5 and 10 Mbit/sec rated. Remember also that network issues between the ISP and the test servers can slow down results, but not speed them up - so the most interesting results are the highest ones. Very low results for either ISP should be discounted.) It's also worth noting that according to this page: http://www.dslreports.com/archive Eastlink is currently the number 4 fastest-rated ISP in North America, compared to Aliant which is number 79. In summary: Eastlink is faster. Their 15Mbit/sec is twice as fast as Aliant 10Mbit/sec. Who needs maths? :) Cheers, Andrew
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<dc38db3b-4bbe-449c-8b8c-d09adf1be59a@l32g2000vba.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!l32g2000vba.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<f1473982-42bb-4882-8a5b-aab99cda7b92@t10g2000vbg.googlegroups.com> <BXxVl.29210$Db2.20814@edtnps83> <uebd259qh296k1akj34lq33gtc5qoopb6q@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 48560ea9d0,6ecbe9ae13fdb75b X-Google-Attributes: gid48560ea9d0,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!l32g2000vba.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: thparkth <andythescot@gmail.com> Newsgroups: hfx.general Subject: Re: Eastlink vs Bell Aliant - who has the best bundle nowadays? Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:29:07 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 54 Message-ID: <dc38db3b-4bbe-449c-8b8c-d09adf1be59a@l32g2000vba.googlegroups.com> References: <f1473982-42bb-4882-8a5b-aab99cda7b92@t10g2000vbg.googlegroups.com> <BXxVl.29210$Db2.20814@edtnps83> <uebd259qh296k1akj34lq33gtc5qoopb6q@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.222.135.90 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1244129347 31607 127.0.0.1 (4 Jun 2009 15:29:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: l32g2000vba.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.222.135.90; posting-account=eR7X8wkAAAAzU9jrPrzsLLvgxaydo4yI User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/530.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/2.0.172.30 Safari/530.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)