Article View: hfx.general
Article #15Re: Learn how to post -- top post
From: JD
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:19
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:19
120 lines
6157 bytes
6157 bytes
"Bazza" <somewhere@somehow.ca> wrote in message news:Ix8Ri.15410$G25.685@edtnps89... > Frank F. Matthews wrote: >> >> >> Al Smith wrote: >> >>>> "Al Smith" <invalid@address.com> wrote in message >>>> news:jfqQi.11311$G25.3392@edtnps89... >>>> >>>>>> >> Hey (mdmdmdm@nd.com) wrote: >>>>>> >> : Either TOP post or bottom post. Don't post in the middle and >>>>>> : leave >> all the other shit behind. Quit being a lazy shit! >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> *** Middle posters are almost more evil than top posters, >>>>>> especially >>>>>> >> when they don't leave blank lines around their comments. >> >> >>>>>> >> A good posting method is to intersperse comments among >>>>>> edited, quoted >>>>>> >> text as a conversation would flow. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Richard >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> PS: Please don't top (or middle) post. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Thanks >> >> >>>>> > Middle posting depends on the post you are replying to. If it is >>>>> long and > contains a large number of small points, it's almost >>>>> necessary to space > the responses throughout the quoted text, instead >>>>> of putting them all at > the bottom, where they would overwhelm the >>>>> reader. >>>>> > >>>>> > -Al- >> >> >>>> Besides. I don't get the concept of 'posting police'. Who determines >>>> the right way to post anyway? >> >> >>> They are self-appointed, like the fashion police and the political >>> correctness police. >>> >>> The posting format is completely up to the person posting. But if they >>> don't want a lot of comments, they must stick more or less to the >>> established conventions. >>> >>> There are always nuts who post craziness that can't even be read. All >>> CAPS, no punctuation, rows of symbols, solid blocks of page-long text. I >>> don't even bother reading posts the formatting of which is far from the >>> norm. Generally, they contain no worthwhile content. >>> >>> Top posting is just laziness, for the most part. I believe the default >>> Windows news reader automatically positions the cursor at the top of >>> posts, and many people can't be bothered to change it. Or maybe some of >>> them feel that their one-line comment would get lost at the bottom of a >>> huge thread, which (naturally) they do not bother to trim. >>> >>> -Al- >> >> >> Actually if you look rationally top posting make good sense. The major >> advantages are two fold. First, it locates the new information at the >> beginning of the message while retaining the message stream in a single >> document. To me though another significant advantage is that it connects >> the identification of the person posting with the post in a convenient >> manner. For example >> >> with top posting. >> >> Name 3 >> message 3 >> >> name 2 >> message 2 >> >> name 1 message 1 >> >> with bottom posting >> >> name 3 >> >> name 2 >> >> > name 1 >> >> >> message 1 >> >> >message 2 >> >> message 3 >> >> The first format makes much more sense. If it were not for the >> irrational rants of the fashion police I would use it fairly >> consistently. Alas the Neanderthals around get off into a major fit so I >> use the bad format for the most part. Unless a rational poster is the >> one I am responding to. >> >> As a real dinosaur I have no idea why the Neanderthals get their knickers >> in such a twit but they do. >> >> I agree that middle posting sometimes makes sense in the situation you >> note. >> >> >> As far as trimming of posts is concerned given the identifications I >> mention it is usually done so badly that unless line prefixes are >> carefully counted individuals often appear to have said something that is >> actually the responsibility of another. Or it trims so much that you >> have no idea what the message is a response to without a long search thru >> the message tree. > Yeah Frank...I too am a top poster. ( forgive this transgression ) I > can't wait to see Richard's response. Yawn... Its kind of true. Most email threads I have seen professionally (and I get close to 1000 per month in my job) are formatted such that the latest addition is at the top.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5OaRi.15420$G25.28@edtnps89>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!edtnps89.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<OMEPi.18142$1y4.9391@pd7urf2no> <470f9d56$0$14879$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <p28vg3dno2kn4dsn19b51dde81vklb8dl4@4ax.com> <470fcedf$0$14866$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <QCTPi.31934$1y4.22927@pd7urf2no> <47100d64$0$14834$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net><OmUPi.32426$th2.4383@pd7urf3no> <Mw3Qi.36036$th2.21231@pd7urf3no> <fl5Qi.35040$1y4.32223@pd7urf2no> <471123fb$0$14880$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <47112d5f$0$14844$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <DebQi.33354$Da.14949@pd7urf1no> <47114fc4$0$14861$9a566e8b@news.al <fet61t$ssk$21@Kil-nws-1.UCIS.Dal.Ca> <jfqQi.11311$G25.3392@edtnps89> <kWqQi.10279$GO5.4749@edtnps90> <larQi.11317$G25.2873@edtnps89> <47138b57$0$7463$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <Ix8Ri.15410$G25.685@edtnps89>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fbdd9,f9aa67f2e4bd428d X-Google-Thread: 103607,f9aa67f2e4bd428d X-Google-Thread: f504b,f9aa67f2e4bd428d X-Google-Thread: 112f74,f9aa67f2e4bd428d X-Google-Thread: 1046d3,f9aa67f2e4bd428d X-Google-Thread: 109a5e,f9aa67f2e4bd428d X-Google-Thread: 1083bf,f9aa67f2e4bd428d X-Google-Attributes: gidfbdd9,gid103607,gidf504b,gid112f74,gid1046d3,gid109a5e,gid1083bf,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!edtnps89.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "JD" <me@home.ca> Newsgroups: hfx.general,rec.travel.usa-canada,can.general,ab.general,soc.culture.canada,calgary.general,van.general References: <OMEPi.18142$1y4.9391@pd7urf2no> <470f9d56$0$14879$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <p28vg3dno2kn4dsn19b51dde81vklb8dl4@4ax.com> <470fcedf$0$14866$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <QCTPi.31934$1y4.22927@pd7urf2no> <47100d64$0$14834$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net><OmUPi.32426$th2.4383@pd7urf3no> <Mw3Qi.36036$th2.21231@pd7urf3no> <fl5Qi.35040$1y4.32223@pd7urf2no> <471123fb$0$14880$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <47112d5f$0$14844$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <DebQi.33354$Da.14949@pd7urf1no> <47114fc4$0$14861$9a566e8b@news.al <fet61t$ssk$21@Kil-nws-1.UCIS.Dal.Ca> <jfqQi.11311$G25.3392@edtnps89> <kWqQi.10279$GO5.4749@edtnps90> <larQi.11317$G25.2873@edtnps89> <47138b57$0$7463$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <Ix8Ri.15410$G25.685@edtnps89> Subject: Re: Learn how to post -- top post Lines: 122 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response Message-ID: <5OaRi.15420$G25.28@edtnps89> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:19:45 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.224.182.243 X-Trace: edtnps89 1192573185 24.224.182.243 (Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:19:45 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:19:45 MDT