🚀 go-pugleaf

Is it possible that the Libs believe that this registry is only to help prevent
gun crimes?  (and that it in no way "persecutes" honest law-abiding gun
owners)?

Personally I agree with the principle if only applied to handguns &
semi-automatic & higher rifles, but I can't recall the last time anyone
attempted to rob a bank or 7-11 with a deer rifle!  So why is it necessary for
those up north and other remote areas to register their rifles & shotguns,
except to have a list of people to confiscate these potential last defenses
from when the government goes real bad?


--

Because I care,

|<+]::-( ("Cyberpope," the Bishop of ROM!)
(aka Reverend George A. Pope)
        (Please quote with "gapope wrote...")
-=-
In essentials, unity;
In non-essentials, liberty;
in all things, charity.  -- Baxter quoting Augustine
-=-
note new preferred reply email: Cyberpope67(at)yahoo(dot)com

PS This post specially encoded for verification purposes


"Lone Ghost" <ghosts_walk_alone@yahoo.com> wrote:
"G> 
"G> 
"G> "The Charter of Rights is about preventing the majority from
"G> taking away the rights of a minority. The Government should not
"G> persecute a minority in this way."
"G>                                   Quoted from his CBC town hall last
"G> night.
"G> 
"G> (Apparently this rule does not apply to gun owners.)
"G> 
-- 
.
from gapope(at)vcn(dot)bc(dot)ca << Official Reply Address for Usenet Post
.