🚀 go-pugleaf

Ahhh, did you run out of methylphenidate again ?  You really should stay off
the computer when that happens.  Now run along back to grade six and let the
adults talk about the important stuff like a good boy.


"Bob Bomarc" <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote in message
news:F9SP4SPL37877.6304050926@anonymous.poster...
> >From: "Electra" <a@b.c>
> >Newsgroups: hfx.general, ns.general, can.general, bc.general
> >Subject: Re: Anna Lindh, Rest In Peace
>
> >Again I see the quote marks but no attribution for who said what.
> >This is the first I have seen of this post.
>
> Cut your losses. Move on. Nobody cares what you think.
>
> >"ElectroVox" <local.host@usenet.net> wrote in message
> >news:ff5366ee901622acde4c9e7c7771efe2@news.teranews.com...
> >>
> >> >Remember Anna Lindh? She was the Swedish foreign minister
> >> >dubbed the "Scandinavian Taliban" for her terrorist apologetics.
>
> >Who dubbed her this?  What specific remarks are being refered to here?
>
> You mean you don't know? Holy shite, are you admitting that you don't
> KNOW something?
>
> > >In January 2002 she said: "I think this discussion about equating
> > >[Yasser] Arafat with terrorists is both inappropriate and stupid.
> > >It is a very dangerous policy."
>
> > Ohhhh-kay. So she thought Yasser Arafat was NOT a terrorist. Check.
>
> >The "ohhh-kay" was supposed to be intrepetted by us as delivering your
> >opinion on this statement ?  Some things in the print media need to be
> >said rather than attempting by your "style" of typing to get us to
> >infer what you mean.
>
> "Ohhhh-kay. Electra is a dumb cunt". What shall we 'infer' then?
>
> Answer: You're a dumb cunt. Shut up.
>
> >She was quite right in this statement.
>
> Like hell.
>
> >The "internal colonisation" of the Palestinians by the Israel is a well
> >documented fact.  The treatment they are receiving bears similarity to
> >what German did in the 30s and 40s.
>
> Spoken like a true Jew-hater. Still holding on to your Zyklon-B stock
> certificates 'just in case'? Probably so.
>
> >Israel is willing to committ quiet atrocities to "conquer" the
> territory
> >it feels is necessary for its security. That this illicits "terror
> like"
> >tactics from a group of people using the only means at its disposal to
> >defend themselves has been seen time and time again by nations
> currently
> >deemed legitimate. The demonisation of Arafat while in some measure
> based
> >in fact, is in large part indicative of the policy of peace through
> power
> >that Israel is pursuing.  Remember the English spoke the same way of
> the
> >Irish less that a hundred years ago.
>
> And the English were right. The IRA were and are a pack of terrorists
> and should have been strung up from lamp poles. Arafat is a terrorist
> too
> and with any luck, he'll get to join allah in 'paradise' sometime real
> soon.
> Why don't you fly over there and 'stand with him' so you can join him
> when he gets his 72 virgins and the big banquet table in the hereafter?
>
> >> >Then, in November, she denounced America for killing six al Qaeda
> >> >terrorists in Yemen: "If the U.S.A. is behind this with Yemen's
> >> >consent, it is nevertheless a summary execution that violates
> >> >human rights," she said. "Even terrorists must be treated
> >> >according to international law. Otherwise, any country can
> >> >start executing those whom they consider terrorists."
> >>
> >> She thought terrorists should be treated according to international
> >> law. Terrorists who violate EVERY international law when they commit
> >> their terrorist acts. Check.
>
> >Another way of saying it is that one man's terrorist is another man's
> >freedom fighter and the apparent crimes of these freedom fighters may
> >not be crimes at all in the more dispassionate eyes of the
> International
> >Tribunal. Why do you think the Amercians are doing everything they can
> >to avoid it ? Acts they carried out all over the world were nothing
> >short of terror.  So she is right in this, let the law prevail.
>
> She's not 'right' anymore. I say let the formaldehyde being pumped
> into her now lifeless veins prevail. :)
>
> >> >Lindh, 46, died September 11, 2003 after undergoing 10 hours
> >> >of surgery following what may turn out to be a horrific irony -
> >> >she herself may have been the victim of a terrorist attack:
> >> >"She was knifed in an upscale Stockholm department store
> >> >Wednesday by an unknown assailant," reports the AP, which
> >> >in another dispatch describes her as "an outspoken human
> >> >rights advocate." Lindh's death is proof, as if any were
> >> >needed, that "understanding" the enemies of civilization
> >> >will not stop them from killing you if they get a chance.
>
> >> Indeed.
>
> >Indeed ?
>
> Is there an echo in here? Must be, the echo of your empty
> fucking skull. ***INDEED***
>
> >Wait a minute, the report doesn't say she was killed by a
> >terrorist.
>
> What do you call somebody who attacks someone without warning
> in a public place, a knife-wielding killer in a Swedish
> department store? Sounds like an act of terrorism to me.
>
> But where was the store security? Where were the security
> cams? The images captured on surveillance tape? Whatzat?
> Sweden is a PEACEFUL society where such things don't happen?
>
> Why certainly. Which is why services for Anna Lindh will be
> held sometime in the next few days. Bring your peace signs.
>
> >>Where is the parallel being drawn from ?  How is this proof about
> >>anything to do with terrorism ?  She died exemplifying her point
> >>that the law must prevail.
>
> Bullshit. She died while she was in the lingerie section.
>
> >>When there is no justice, there is no peace.
>
> Saddam and his filthy regime has been disposed of, so we may
> now conclude that justice will be re-established and peace for
> the Iraqi people will be the result. Right?
>
> >>She would no more have her assailant summarily killed
> >>than she would have the Americans go into Iraq for false reasons.
>
> If her assailant were convicted of first degree murder in a country
> where the death penalty is enforced, Lindh wouldn't have anything
> to say about it. And she had nothing to say about the Americans
> going into Iraq because she was insignificant, irrelevant, and
> of absolutely no consequence in the grand scheme of things.
>
> >>Blair is paying for his lies but it seems that the Americans are
> >>not as civilised as the British.
>
> Blair isnt paying fuckall and the BBC has been exposed as the
> Saddam loving toadies they are, and George Galloway has been
> proven to be a traitor and hopefully he'll do the David Kelly
> shuffle sometime real soon. And just like Lindh? No loss.
>
> >> Maybe the 19 al Qaeda hijackers will buy Anna a drink if they
> >> bump into each other somewhere in the hereafter.
>
> >I definitely would.
>
> Of course. Because you are a terrorist sympathizer and you fully
> support the goals of al Qaeda and other Islamic terrorist groups.
>
> >She sounds like anything but a Taliban.  She sounds like she
> >stood for Justice.  al Qaeda, whatever you think of their
> >tactics probably wouldn't salute this woman in this life or
> >the next, first because she is a woman and secondly because
> >she was a westerner, and finally because she believed we are
> >subject to the law.
>
> She was an ignorant, arrogant, terrorist-loving cunt. Like you.
>
> >> It's the least they can do for all of her past support.
>
> >I doubt she ever said one word of support for them, at least
> >it wasn't in anthing I read here.
>
> You couldn't find the forest for the trees if they were burning
> all around you.
>
> >> (source): The Wall Street Journal/Opinion Journal Online
>
> >Its not like they ever lied in any of their stories or anything ...
>
> Really? When did the Wall Street Journal lie in their stories?
>
> We're all waiting for you to give some examples.
>
> >> ElectroVox Has Spoken.
>
> >sadly, yes.
>
> E-Vox at least sources their posts. You just babble with a mindset
> no different than Barbara Streisand.
>
> Anna Lindh. John Walker 'Johnny Taliban' Lindh.
>
> Must be something in that family line that breeds stupidity,
> treason, and venereal disease.
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
> The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
> is unverified.
>
>