🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <385539A7.7582EB61@hotmail.com>,
antitheist  <antitheist@hotmail.com> wrote:
>For those who missed it the first time:
>
>Therefore, in the closing days of this millenium, I call upon any deity
>which exists to provide proof of its existence, concrete proof which
>cannot be denied by any rational means, cannot be explained in any other
>way.  Only such evidence can finally resolve all conflicts sparked by
>religion, and put an end to the struggles which hold us back from
>progression as human beings.  Only a lack of such evidence can provide
>evidence that such a deity or deities does not exist, and individuals
>can then be free to pursue their own rational ends without fear of the
>intervention of the lunatics and anti-life doctrinarians who try to
>propagate belief systems.
>

God willing, your post will be more likely to be answered if you direct
it to the correct newsgroup.... have you tried either
soc.religion.deities-corner or
alt.postings.dufus-with-delusions-of-grandeur?

:-)

Somehow, I just have this feeling that any deity worth its salt will have
better things to do than prove its own existence to you.



-- 
"There is a huge difference between disliking somebody - maybe even disliking
 them a lot - and actually shooting them, strangling them, dragging them
____________  through the fields and setting their house on fire. It was a 
John Bartol \___ difference which kept the vast majority of the population    
john.bartol@zadall.com\  alive from day to day." [DGHDA by Douglas Adams]