🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <onv351t7b358c1q23p010lc5ejv6ts82pj@4ax.com>,
John Fleming  <nospamn@sprynet.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:21:25 +0000 (UTC), while chained to a desk in the
>scriptorium, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> $In article <70p1515rb0fls3aif982s2jaep9865b3os@4ax.com>,
>> $John Fleming  <nospam@nsprynet.com> wrote:
>> $>On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:16:38 +0000 (UTC), while chained to a desk in the
>> $>scriptorium, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> $>> $In article <97c0519hid2enhik12paickn7uijp0bbge@4ax.com>,
>> $>> $John Fleming  <nospam@isprynet.com> wrote:
>> $>> $>On 3 Apr 2005 10:15:16 -0700, while chained to a desk in the
>> $>> $>scriptorium, "gman99" <gman99@canada.com> wrote:
>> $>> $>> $SunDancer wrote:
>> $>> $>
>> $>> $>> $> ...condoms promote promiscuity, sex outside of marriage and
>> $>> $>> $> the spread of STD's b/c they don't always work or are used
>> $>> $>> $> incorrectly.
>> $>> $>> $
>> $>> $>> $You are one simple sumbitch...BIOLOGY promotes promiscuity...not
>> $>> $>> $condoms. Humans have been VERY promiscuous long before condoms were
>> $>> $>> $invented.
>> $>> $>
>> $>> $>Besides, sex is fun.
>> $>> $
>> $>> $careful not to go there.
>> $>
>> $>Why not?
>> $
>> $STD
>
>Man, with that leap of logic you will be competing with John Lauzon on
>no time flat.
>
>Sex, in and of itself, is neither good nor evil.  It serves a biological
>purpose for the preservation of the species.  And when participants
>engage in sex for reasons othe rthan procreation, much enjoyment can be
>had by the participants.
>
>That said, STDs are a reality, and a person can choose sexual practices
>that minimize the risk, for example, engaging is sex as part of a
>monogamous relationship with a like minded partner.  Additional
>protection can be had by using things like condoms.
>
>The opposite extreme, which does expose one to a significantly higher
>risk of contracting something, includes activities like playing musical
>beds with the ladies of the nights while leaving the condoms at home.
>
>The amount of risk of STDs assumed is a function of the decisions made
>by the participants.  When the risks are properly managed, the
>particiants truly can have a lot of fun between the sheets.
>

Hence monogamy.
-- 
Member - Liberal International	
This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca	Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
UK as 5 May 2005 approaches, vote LDem!!