Article View: hfx.general
Article #54347Re: Government Planning?
From: JD
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 02:47
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 02:47
46 lines
2714 bytes
2714 bytes
> Shiny new roundabout; the guy that came up with that idea should be shot > and > pissed on. They have been popping up all over the place. > > Even the Kippers, who invented them, don't build them anymore because they > don't work; which is why the Kippers invented them in the first place. The > old adage; buy Kipper or buy something that works. Who said they don't work? ** They don't. They slow traffic rather than smooth the flow Why do they not work? ** Because they are in efficient. The slow traffic rather than increase the flow. What do you advocate that is better than a roundabout?? ** Traffic lights (vastly cheaper and just as efficient) or parklos; worked great when they replaced the MicMac Rotary. A circle is a much more efficient handler of traffic than a set of lights... who wants ot sit at a red watching cars all go through... but the whole concept should be pretty simple... yield to the traffic in the center, and put some boot in to it and get the hell in the cirlcle, and off when you want... *** Not efficient at all. And, in Nova Scotia where people have difficulty with a regular old merge, they are a recipe for a good set of accidents; especially if traffic volumes are high. Most of them here are too small to be efficient. You can't use them, don't make the rest of us sit at a red because you can't drive. *** I can use them just fine. However, they are a stupid idea at best and an expensive waste of money at worst. Maybe you're used to traffic circles, where the center yields to incoming traffic -- THAT does not work. *** I don't believe I have seen one of those for years; not since I saw them in France.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<iil23r$qbd$1@speranza.aioe.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<4d45dced$0$8496$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <ii6672$tps$1@speranza.aioe.org> <09b9deba-7b80-477f-a82c-02dcd2514e30@k4g2000pre.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fbdd9,45853f0afbe051b9 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gid48560ea9d0,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "JD" <me@home.ca> Newsgroups: hfx.general Subject: Re: Government Planning? Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 22:47:23 -0400 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 48 Message-ID: <iil23r$qbd$1@speranza.aioe.org> References: <4d45dced$0$8496$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <ii6672$tps$1@speranza.aioe.org> <09b9deba-7b80-477f-a82c-02dcd2514e30@k4g2000pre.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: FoIrrhi+83v3K5mQ+Aidew.user.speranza.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal