🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <nVjqd.195845$df2.99934@edtnps89>, Me@home.ca says...
>
>
>"Danie|_ Swan" <DAN@ZIONIST-HEADQUARTERS.com> wrote in message
>news:whfqd.195766$df2.102020@edtnps89...
>> In article <vFaqd.195323$df2.116185@edtnps89>, Me@home.ca says...
>> >
>> >
>> >"Danie|_ Swan" <DAN@ZIONIST-HEADQUARTERS.com> wrote in message
>> >news:bL9qd.9604$cE3.5861@clgrps12...
>> >> In article <1R5qd.195180$df2.152291@edtnps89>, Me@home.ca says...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >"His Divine Shadow" <hisshadow@bigmailbox.net> wrote in message
>> >> >news:BDCE19E8.3E3D9%hisshadow@bigmailbox.net...
>> >> >> On 11/23/04 3:00 PM, FNO's useable flesh will be contributed to the
>> >> >Protein
>> >> >> Bank, where it will be recycled for purposes that serve His Shadow.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > "His Divine Shadow" <hisshadow@bigmailbox.net> wrote in message
>> >> >> > news:BDC85E77.3DE5E%hisshadow@bigmailbox.net...
>> >> >> >> On 11/21/04 6:06 PM, FNO's useable flesh will be contributed to
>the
>> >> >> > Protein
>> >> >> >> Bank, where it will be recycled for purposes that serve His
>Shadow.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> Secondly, if you think that consciousness is as a result solely
>of
>> >> >brain
>> >> >> >>> activity, you are the foolish one.  There is significant
>evidence
>> >that
>> >> >> > some
>> >> >> >>> consciousness originates elsewhere.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Post it. I need a laugh.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > I'm already having one.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Evasion noted.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >It was already posted some long ways back while arguing with a fool.
>> >Just
>> >> >read back in this thread.  Its already there.
>> >> >> -
>> >>
>> >> what about the part of this thread where you admitted you were an idiot
>> >and
>> >> apologized for being stupid?  Just read back in this thread, it's
>there.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >Danny boy.  Go back into sulk more.  Try not to be smart.  It doesn't
>become
>> >you.  No more arguments so you have to resort to just insults.
>>
>> Now how is it insulting to agree with you that you're stupid?  Does this
>mean
>> you're renegging on your apology?
>>
>>
>>
>
>Because, Danny boy,  you are not agreeing with me.  I never said any such
>thing, nor did I apologize for it; I never would, because I am not.  

Go back and read the thread.  You also said that you like wearing frilly 
panties.