🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <Z6Spd.208970$9b.15637@edtnps84>,
 DAN@ZIONIST-HEADQUARTERS.com (Danie|_ Swan) wrote:

> In article <gdeppe-6A628E.22545426112004@news.telus.net>, gdeppe@eastlink.ca 
> says...
> >
> >In article <dXRpd.208965$9b.22975@edtnps84>,
> > DAN@ZIONIST-HEADQUARTERS.com (Danie|_ Swan) wrote:
> >
> >> In article <gdeppe-C42A1E.22433226112004@news.telus.net>, 
> >> gdeppe@eastlink.ca 
> >> says...
> >> >
> >> >In article <pDOpd.6843$cE3.4076@clgrps12>,
> >> > DAN@ZIONIST-HEADQUARTERS.com (Danie|_ Swan) wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> In article <gdeppe-A7CEB7.18113126112004@news.telus.net>, 
> >> >> gdeppe@eastlink.ca 
> >> >> says...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >In article <BcNpd.208596$9b.35750@edtnps84>, "FNO" <Me@home.ca> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> "BP" <noone@fakeaddress.qv> wrote in message
> >> >> >> news:m6kcq01f7k2esed8u4brdhlg66i7c84n46@4ax.com...
> >> >> >> > On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:07:17 GMT, "FNO" <Me@home.ca> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > >"pv" <edrdriver@NOSPAM.telus.net> wrote in message
> >> >> >> > >news:VrIod.179752$df2.31275@edtnps89...
> >> >> >> > >> "Ghost of IT" <ghost_of_the_hangman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >> > >> news:b22f8b35.0411222210.59d6d3ac@posting.google.com...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >(snip)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > >> > To equate mental health issues with religion is considered 
> >> >> >> > >> > taboo, 
> >> >> >> > >> > but
> >> >> >> > >> > there are a lot of similiarities.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Ye oldde science vs. religion. 
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Funny how they refuse to meet on some 3rd level of understanding. 
> >> >> >Humanity seems doomed to always consider one over the other... and 
> >> >> >therefore never reach an empasse.
> >> >> >
> >> >> 
> >> >> They?  why don't you start with you.
> >> >
> >> >Could start from the self. 
> >> >
> >> >Only the Self is both U and I
> >> >
> >> >And therefore a transpersonal medium... and might I add... timeless.
> >> 
> >> By the way, this is the sort of junk they blame Derrida for inflicting on 
> >> saps 
> >> like you, even though as far as I can tell he never came close to ever 
> >> uttering sheer gibberish.
> >> 
> >> Just to clarify on forms.  My self is me.  Your self is you.  We're 
> >> different. 
> >
> >There is only ONE... in the end. Call him/her/it what you want... ad 
> >infinitum.
> 
> Ad infinitum is latin for 'infinitely'.  Why would I call him/her/it 
> infinitely?

I meant the philosophical 'infinitum' of the ten-thousand-things. The 
endless dialogues that divert from the Source rather than lead one to it.

> >The Source is the same.
> 
> What source?

exactly!