🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:45:05 GMT, Norman Miller <spamthis@die.invalid>
spake thusly:

>In article <858bd3a9.0411171050.7c8514d0@posting.google.com>, Michael 
>Yardley says...
>
>> <<<< No I am not. I am saying that the whole Bible is False as the
>> subject thread states. They copied it from the Egyptians. the
>> Christians, the Jew's the lot. The atheist newsgroup's address this
>> issue very well. Egyptians Gods and characters can be directly related
>> to "Jesus". "Acanortan". When I was a kid they fed me all this drib
>> about Jesus and Bible. It is a crock of bullshit. >>>
>
>False? Compared to what "Truth"? Copied from the Egyptians? Hardly. The 
>Egyptians were polytheists to the core. How do you get monotheism from a 
>polytheistic origin?

Very very easily. It's no bid deal to combine characteristics into one
"god". 

>Atheists don't address the matter very well at all. An atheistic dogma is 
>still a dogma; an atheistic belief is still a belief. 

Actually, no. Atheism isn't a belief, it's a non-belief.

>Sometimes it seems as 
>though there is more effort to believe in no god than to believe in any god. 

 This is too easy. 
Egyptian polytheism wasn't the only source for monotheism.
Zeus, aka "Zeus Pateras," who we now automatically believe to be a
myth and not a historical figure, takes his name from the Indian
version, "Dyaus Pitar." Dyaus Pitar in turn is related to the Egyptian
"Ptah," and from both Pitar and Ptah comes the word "pater," or
"father." "Zeus" equals "Dyaus," which became "Deos," "Deus" and
"Dios" - "God." "Zeus Pateras," like Dyaus Pitar, means, "God the
Father," a very ancient concept that in no way originated with "Jesus"
and Christianity. There is no question of Zeus being a historical
character. Dyaus Pitar becomes "Jupiter" in Roman mythology, and
likewise is not representative of an actual, historical character. In
Egyptian mythology, Ptah, the Father, is the unseen god-force, and the
sun was viewed as Ptah's visible proxy who brings everlasting life to
the earth; hence, the "son of God" is really the "sun God." Indeed,
according to Hotema, the very name "Christ" comes from the Hindi word
"Kris" (as in Krishna), which is a name for the sun.

 Furthermore, since Horus was called "Iusa/Iao/Iesu" the "KRST," and 
Krishna/Christna was called "Jezeus," centuries before any Jewish
character similarly named, it would be safe to assume that Jesus
Christ is just a repeat of Horus and Krishna, among the rest.
According to Rev. Taylor, the title "Christ" in its Hebraic form
meaning "Anointed" ("Masiah") was held by all kings of Israel, as well
as being "so commonly assumed by all sorts of impostors, conjurers,
and pretenders to supernatural communications, that the very claim to
it is in the gospel itself considered as an indication of imposture .
. ." Hotema states that the name "Jesus Christ" was not formally
adopted in its present form until after the firstCouncil 
of Nicea, i.e., in 325 C.E.

 In actuality, even the place names and the appellations of many other
characters in the New Testament can be revealed to be Hebraicized 
renderings of the Egyptian texts.

 As an example, in the fable of "Lazarus," the mummy raised from the
dead by Jesus, the Christian copyists did not change his name much,
"El-Azar-us" being the Egyptian mummy raised from the dead by Horus
possibly 1,000 years or more before the Jewish version. This story is
allegory for the sun reviving its old, dying self, or father, as in
"El-Osiris." Horus's principal enemy - originally Horus's other face
or "dark" aspect was "Set" or "Sata," whence comes "Satan." Horus
struggles with Set in the exact manner that Jesus battles with Satan,
with 40 days in the wilderness, among other similarities. This is
because this myth represents the triumph of light over dark, or the
sun's return to relieve the terror of the night.

 "Jerusalem" simply means "City of Peace," and the actual city in
Israel was named after the holy city of peace in the Egyptian sacred
texts that already existed at the time the city was founded. Likewise,
"Bethany," site of the famous multiplying of the loaves, means "House
of God," and is allegory for the "multiplication of the Many out of
the One." Any town of that designation was named for the allegorical
place in the texts that existed before the town's foundation. The
Egyptian predecessor and counterpart is "Bethanu."

 The word Is-ra-el itself, far from being a Jewish appellation,
probably comes from the combination of three different reigning
deities: Isis, the Earth Mother Goddess revered throughout the ancient
world; Ra, the Egyptian sungod; and El, the Semitic deity passed down
in form as Saturn. El was one of the earliest names for the god of the
ancient Hebrews (whence Emmanu-El, Micha-El, Gabri-El, Samu-El, etc.),
and his worship is reflected in the fact that the Jews still consider
Saturday as "God's Day."

 Indeed, that the Christians worship on Sunday betrays the genuine
origins of their god and godman. Their "savior" is actually the sun,
which is the "Light of the world that every eye can see." The sun has
been viewed consistently throughout history as the savior of mankind
for reasons that are obvious. Without the sun, the planet would
scarcely last one day. So important was the sun to the ancients that
they composed a "Sun Book," or "Helio Biblia," which became the "Holy
Bible."

-- 
jbuchy@hotmail.com 
(Jim, single dad to Lesleigh [Autistic] 04/20/94)

"What, Me Worry?" A. E. Newman

Please note: All unsolicited e-mail sent to me may, at 
my discretion, be posted in this newsgroup verbatim.