🚀 go-pugleaf

"Brian Bagnall" <bbagnall@mts.net> wrote in message 
news:y3%wg.10724$YC3.7510@newsfe23.lga...
> Apparently Steven Harper agreed to apologize to the Chinese for something
> that happened 120 years ago. How Canadian. Someone runs us over with their
> car and we apologize for denting their bumper.
>
> It's amusing to see people today criticize the leaders of the past for 
> their
> decisions, as though we can say their decisions were wrong even though the
> times were far different. Our leaders at the time knew China was a huge
> place, Canada had a small population, and to allow unrestrained 
> immigration
> from China would soon overwhelm Canadians. Imagine how many would have 
> come
> if there was no head tax. We would be China II right now. Instead of the
> Western way flourishing here, the Eastern philosophy would flourish and
> Canada would be a far different place today.
>
> Let me tell you something bluntly: Those Chinese who paid the head tax 
> were
> lucky to come here. If a stranger asks to stay at your house and you say,
> "Okay, but you have to pay me $50 per day." you are *not* a bad person. 
> You
> don't have to apologize for asking for compensation. It is your home and 
> you
> are entitled to make whatever offer you want. Canada owes no apology to
> anyone they have allowed into the country. Apparently 81,000 came here and
> paid the tax. Enough said.
>
> - B

So dipshit Harper gives single mothers 4 cents a year for child care, and 
wants to pay how much to the Chinese?

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:38:38 GMT
"Aeroplan" <aplan967@shaw.ca> wrote:

> 
> So dipshit Harper gives single mothers 4 cents a year for child care, and 
> wants to pay how much to the Chinese?
> 

Better'n you'll get as a single dad.

Dhu


-- 
???????????????????????????????????????

Open Systems Integration

Contact Fubar the Hack: fubar AT neotext.ca

Area code seven eight zero, Exchange four six six, Local zero one zero nine

Highland terms, Canadian workmanship.

All persons named herein are purely fictional victims
of the Canidian Bagle Breeder's Association.

Save the Bagle! 

Sun Dhu


???????????????????????????????????????

Brian Bagnall wrote:
> Apparently Steven Harper agreed to apologize to the Chinese for something
> that happened 120 years ago. How Canadian. Someone runs us over with their
> car and we apologize for denting their bumper.
>
> It's amusing to see people today criticize the leaders of the past for their
> decisions, as though we can say their decisions were wrong even though the
> times were far different. Our leaders at the time knew China was a huge
> place, Canada had a small population, and to allow unrestrained immigration
> from China would soon overwhelm Canadians. Imagine how many would have come
> if there was no head tax. We would be China II right now. Instead of the
> Western way flourishing here, the Eastern philosophy would flourish and
> Canada would be a far different place today.
>
> Let me tell you something bluntly: Those Chinese who paid the head tax were
> lucky to come here. If a stranger asks to stay at your house and you say,
> "Okay, but you have to pay me $50 per day." you are *not* a bad person. You
> don't have to apologize for asking for compensation. It is your home and you
> are entitled to make whatever offer you want. Canada owes no apology to
> anyone they have allowed into the country. Apparently 81,000 came here and
> paid the tax. Enough said.
>
> - B

Actually is not really 'Canadian' as much as i dont like harper its
something most governments do. Wait till there is not many 'victims
left' and pay a minimal amount (vs billions much more recently to such
crimes' Its more tokenism then anything in terms of taking
responsibility for such government behavior.
 The head tax as i see is not much of an issue for me personally, maybe
it could have been conducted better but the main concept being to help
stem the tide of immigration is something all countries do.
 No nation will warmly welcome a massive large influx of people who are
different. Doing so would change language , culture, customs and
eventually laws.

"Aeroplan" <aplan967@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:iG%wg.163101$771.60097@edtnps89...

> So dipshit Harper gives single mothers 4 cents a year for child care,
and
> wants to pay how much to the Chinese?

    He's just trying to make himself look good, by doing something too
many years too late.  Politicians seem to think that gestures of good
will, at any time for any amount, will increase their popularity.

    Good luck, "Steve".

"Aeroplan" <aplan967@shaw.ca> wrote in message 
news:iG%wg.163101$771.60097@edtnps89...
>
> "Brian Bagnall" <bbagnall@mts.net> wrote in message 
> news:y3%wg.10724$YC3.7510@newsfe23.lga...
>> Apparently Steven Harper agreed to apologize to the Chinese for something
>> that happened 120 years ago. How Canadian. Someone runs us over with 
>> their
>> car and we apologize for denting their bumper.
>>
>> It's amusing to see people today criticize the leaders of the past for 
>> their
>> decisions, as though we can say their decisions were wrong even though 
>> the
>> times were far different. Our leaders at the time knew China was a huge
>> place, Canada had a small population, and to allow unrestrained 
>> immigration
>> from China would soon overwhelm Canadians. Imagine how many would have 
>> come
>> if there was no head tax. We would be China II right now. Instead of the
>> Western way flourishing here, the Eastern philosophy would flourish and
>> Canada would be a far different place today.
>>
>> Let me tell you something bluntly: Those Chinese who paid the head tax 
>> were
>> lucky to come here. If a stranger asks to stay at your house and you say,
>> "Okay, but you have to pay me $50 per day." you are *not* a bad person. 
>> You
>> don't have to apologize for asking for compensation. It is your home and 
>> you
>> are entitled to make whatever offer you want. Canada owes no apology to
>> anyone they have allowed into the country. Apparently 81,000 came here 
>> and
>> paid the tax. Enough said.
>>
>> - B
>
> So dipshit Harper gives single mothers 4 cents a year for child care, and 
> wants to pay how much to the Chinese?

so in what program is he giving 4 cents a year? I must have missed that. 

Brian Bagnall <bbagnall@mts.net> wrote in message
news:y3%wg.10724$YC3.7510@newsfe23.lga...
> Apparently Steven Harper agreed to apologize to the Chinese for something
> that happened 120 years ago. How Canadian. Someone runs us over with their
> car and we apologize for denting their bumper.
>
> It's amusing to see people today criticize the leaders of the past for
their
> decisions, as though we can say their decisions were wrong even though the
> times were far different. Our leaders at the time knew China was a huge
> place, Canada had a small population, and to allow unrestrained
immigration
> from China would soon overwhelm Canadians. Imagine how many would have
come
> if there was no head tax. We would be China II right now.

Umm... <ahem> ... <cough>Vancouver<<cough>Calgary<cough>Edmonton<cough>

"mich" <copkat@videtron.ca> wrote in message 
news:Dj3xg.5384$9w.147113@weber.videotron.net...
>
> "Aeroplan" <aplan967@shaw.ca> wrote in message 
> news:iG%wg.163101$771.60097@edtnps89...
>>
>> "Brian Bagnall" <bbagnall@mts.net> wrote in message 
>> news:y3%wg.10724$YC3.7510@newsfe23.lga...
>>> Apparently Steven Harper agreed to apologize to the Chinese for 
>>> something
>>> that happened 120 years ago. How Canadian. Someone runs us over with 
>>> their
>>> car and we apologize for denting their bumper.
>>>
>>> It's amusing to see people today criticize the leaders of the past for 
>>> their
>>> decisions, as though we can say their decisions were wrong even though 
>>> the
>>> times were far different. Our leaders at the time knew China was a huge
>>> place, Canada had a small population, and to allow unrestrained 
>>> immigration
>>> from China would soon overwhelm Canadians. Imagine how many would have 
>>> come
>>> if there was no head tax. We would be China II right now. Instead of the
>>> Western way flourishing here, the Eastern philosophy would flourish and
>>> Canada would be a far different place today.
>>>
>>> Let me tell you something bluntly: Those Chinese who paid the head tax 
>>> were
>>> lucky to come here. If a stranger asks to stay at your house and you 
>>> say,
>>> "Okay, but you have to pay me $50 per day." you are *not* a bad person. 
>>> You
>>> don't have to apologize for asking for compensation. It is your home and 
>>> you
>>> are entitled to make whatever offer you want. Canada owes no apology to
>>> anyone they have allowed into the country. Apparently 81,000 came here 
>>> and
>>> paid the tax. Enough said.
>>>
>>> - B
>>
>> So dipshit Harper gives single mothers 4 cents a year for child care, and 
>> wants to pay how much to the Chinese?
>
> so in what program is he giving 4 cents a year? I must have missed that.

It's called sarcasm, look into it.

I heard that Harper wants to give $20000 per head for those who paid the 
tax.  In contrast, he gives single parents $1200 a year for child care, 
which is obviously not adequate. 

"DetectorTHX11:59" <an@rchy.com> wrote in message 
news:12c9m19gb0dg35d@corp.supernews.com...
> Brian Bagnall <bbagnall@mts.net> wrote in message
> news:y3%wg.10724$YC3.7510@newsfe23.lga...
>> Apparently Steven Harper agreed to apologize to the Chinese for something
>> that happened 120 years ago. How Canadian. Someone runs us over with 
>> their
>> car and we apologize for denting their bumper.
>>
>> It's amusing to see people today criticize the leaders of the past for
> their
>> decisions, as though we can say their decisions were wrong even though 
>> the
>> times were far different. Our leaders at the time knew China was a huge
>> place, Canada had a small population, and to allow unrestrained
> immigration
>> from China would soon overwhelm Canadians. Imagine how many would have
> come
>> if there was no head tax. We would be China II right now.
>
> Umm... <ahem> ... <cough>Vancouver<<cough>Calgary<cough>Edmonton<cough>

Lol.

Apparently someone hasn't been to Richmond BC in a while.  I have nothing 
against the Chinese of course, but they are a majority now in some parts of 
Canada. 

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:57:51 -0500, "Brian Bagnall" <bbagnall@mts.net>
wrote:

#Apparently Steven Harper agreed to apologize to the Chinese for
something
#that happened 120 years ago. How Canadian. Someone runs us over with
their
#car and we apologize for denting their bumper.
#

This is as silly as Clinton going to Africa and apologizing for
slavery.  I doubt it gets Harper any votes in the next election.  If
Chinese see the Conservatives as racist rednecks, this is not going to
change their minds. 

>
> I heard that Harper wants to give $20000 per head for those who paid the 
> tax.  In contrast, he gives single parents $1200 a year for child care, 
> which is obviously not adequate.
I suppose we're all entitled to our entitlements

"judgejudy" <judgejudy@shaw.ca> wrote in message 
news:c05ac294ug1i38nb3rddd401i7gpk25ta0@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:57:51 -0500, "Brian Bagnall" <bbagnall@mts.net>
> wrote:
>
> #Apparently Steven Harper agreed to apologize to the Chinese for
> something
> #that happened 120 years ago. How Canadian. Someone runs us over with
> their
> #car and we apologize for denting their bumper.
> #
>
> This is as silly as Clinton going to Africa and apologizing for
> slavery.  I doubt it gets Harper any votes in the next election.  If
> Chinese see the Conservatives as racist rednecks, this is not going to
> change their minds.

most "ethnics" will vote conservative as that party represents their 
upbringing more than the lefties.  Majority gov't on its way 

"Jack" <bigcletus@yahoo.com.com> wrote in message 
news:9hbxg.14434$pu3.336511@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> >
>> I heard that Harper wants to give $20000 per head for those who paid the 
>> tax.  In contrast, he gives single parents $1200 a year for child care, 
>> which is obviously not adequate.
> I suppose we're all entitled to our entitlements

Sure, and when it comes to Conservatives, even that isn't enough. 

"judgejudy" <judgejudy@shaw.ca> wrote in message 
news:c05ac294ug1i38nb3rddd401i7gpk25ta0@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:57:51 -0500, "Brian Bagnall" <bbagnall@mts.net>
> wrote:
>
> #Apparently Steven Harper agreed to apologize to the Chinese for
> something
> #that happened 120 years ago. How Canadian. Someone runs us over with
> their
> #car and we apologize for denting their bumper.
> #
>
> This is as silly as Clinton going to Africa and apologizing for
> slavery.  I doubt it gets Harper any votes in the next election.  If
> Chinese see the Conservatives as racist rednecks, this is not going to
> change their minds.

I think Chinese vote conservative more than Liberal. They've seen both the 
leftist Socialist system (mainland China) compared side by side with free 
markets (Hong Kong) and they judge accordingly. Harper didn't have to do 
this and I agree, it won't get him any more votes.

- B 

"Aeroplan" <aplan967@shaw.ca> wrote in message 
news:XIdxg.133387$I61.94990@clgrps13...
>
> "Jack" <bigcletus@yahoo.com.com> wrote in message 
> news:9hbxg.14434$pu3.336511@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>> >
>>> I heard that Harper wants to give $20000 per head for those who paid the 
>>> tax.  In contrast, he gives single parents $1200 a year for child care, 
>>> which is obviously not adequate.
>> I suppose we're all entitled to our entitlements
>
> Sure, and when it comes to Conservatives, even that isn't enough.
you poor left wing loon..you are so confused... 

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:52:34 GMT, "Jack" <bigcletus@yahoo.com.com> wrote in
message <Cibxg.14437$pu3.336515@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>

>
>"judgejudy" <judgejudy@shaw.ca> wrote in message 
>news:c05ac294ug1i38nb3rddd401i7gpk25ta0@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:57:51 -0500, "Brian Bagnall" <bbagnall@mts.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> #Apparently Steven Harper agreed to apologize to the Chinese for
>> something
>> #that happened 120 years ago. How Canadian. Someone runs us over with
>> their
>> #car and we apologize for denting their bumper.
>> #
>>
>> This is as silly as Clinton going to Africa and apologizing for
>> slavery.  I doubt it gets Harper any votes in the next election.  If
>> Chinese see the Conservatives as racist rednecks, this is not going to
>> change their minds.
>
>most "ethnics" will vote conservative as that party represents their 
>upbringing more than the lefties.  Majority gov't on its way 
>

What planet are you from?

Aeroplan wrote:
> "Jack" <bigcletus@yahoo.com.com> wrote in message 
> news:9hbxg.14434$pu3.336511@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>>> I heard that Harper wants to give $20000 per head for those who paid the 
>>> tax.  In contrast, he gives single parents $1200 a year for child care, 
>>> which is obviously not adequate.
>> I suppose we're all entitled to our entitlements
> 
> Sure, and when it comes to Conservatives, even that isn't enough. 
> 
> 


It seems that NOBODY can spend like the Tories!!!

Moron! You either have to live with the fact that Chinese are rising to take
back control of the world or kill yourself!

Pathetic loser!


"Brian Bagnall" <bbagnall@mts.net> wrote in message
news:y3%wg.10724$YC3.7510@newsfe23.lga...
> Apparently Steven Harper agreed to apologize to the Chinese for something
> that happened 120 years ago. How Canadian. Someone runs us over with their
> car and we apologize for denting their bumper.
>
> It's amusing to see people today criticize the leaders of the past for
their
> decisions, as though we can say their decisions were wrong even though the
> times were far different. Our leaders at the time knew China was a huge
> place, Canada had a small population, and to allow unrestrained
immigration
> from China would soon overwhelm Canadians. Imagine how many would have
come
> if there was no head tax. We would be China II right now. Instead of the
> Western way flourishing here, the Eastern philosophy would flourish and
> Canada would be a far different place today.
>
> Let me tell you something bluntly: Those Chinese who paid the head tax
were
> lucky to come here. If a stranger asks to stay at your house and you say,
> "Okay, but you have to pay me $50 per day." you are *not* a bad person.
You
> don't have to apologize for asking for compensation. It is your home and
you
> are entitled to make whatever offer you want. Canada owes no apology to
> anyone they have allowed into the country. Apparently 81,000 came here and
> paid the tax. Enough said.
>
> - B
>
>

Brian Bagnall wrote:

snipped...
> Let me tell you something bluntly: Those Chinese who paid the head tax were
> lucky to come here. If a stranger asks to stay at your house and you say,

Canada was as much a home to the social trash junked out of England or
Europe as it was to any other ethnic group.  At least those who had not
been convicts at home made better founders than those who had.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\




> "Okay, but you have to pay me $50 per day." you are *not* a bad person. You
> don't have to apologize for asking for compensation. It is your home and you
> are entitled to make whatever offer you want. Canada owes no apology to
> anyone they have allowed into the country. Apparently 81,000 came here and
> paid the tax. Enough said.
> 
> - B

And THEeeeen...we can get all the Chinese gangs of our larger cities to 
apologize for importing so much MORE wonderful crime and those awesome 
drugs.  Anyone remember the incident a few years ago in Moncton where one 
chap had his achilles (sp?) tendon cut so he could not run away?

Well everyone, as we all know the 'true' Canadian identity is LONG gone. 
Those in power put E V E R Y T H I N G ahead of the beaver, Maple Leaf, 
Mountie hats...the works and almost SHAME everyone else who doesn't. I LOVE 
the cultural identities but once here, we...and I DO say WE...ARE CANADIANS 
FIRST...or so we were lead to believe for so long.  PUT THE FLAG IN THE 
CLASSROOMS...BRING BACK THE BIBLE...I WOULD LIKE TO SEE NON-CHRISTIAN 
PASSAGES INTRODUCED TOO for the benefit of non-Christian kids in that 
particular classroom.

Interesting...seeing the MultiCulturalism at Alderney Landing and at work at 
a certain bldg on Highfield Park Drive...IT'S ALL THERE...except 
Anglo-Saxon...hmmm...let's see NEW SCOTLAND.  NADA...NOTHING...for pete 
sake...we don't promote ourSELVES while endorsing others.  Methinks we're 
now scared to speak out for fear of being tagged with the R word.

So...apologize...perhaps. Acknowledge it was wrong...yes. Expect anything 
similar in return...not too damn likely. 

Icarus wrote:
> And THEeeeen...we can get all the Chinese gangs of our larger cities to
> apologize for importing so much MORE wonderful crime and those awesome
> drugs.

***The largest drug smuggling operation in BC is operated by Hell's
Angel and these are not Chinese.
***  The consumers of the drugs so imported are mostly non-Chinese.
With the market demand created by the non-Chinese consumers, how could
any import be stopped?
***The people that made Hong Kong a British colony through opium
smuggling were not Chinese.

Go take a few courses from Affirmative Action classes.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\




 Anyone remember the incident a few years ago in Moncton where one
> chap had his achilles (sp?) tendon cut so he could not run away?
>
> Well everyone, as we all know the 'true' Canadian identity is LONG gone.
> Those in power put E V E R Y T H I N G ahead of the beaver, Maple Leaf,
> Mountie hats...the works and almost SHAME everyone else who doesn't. I LOVE
> the cultural identities but once here, we...and I DO say WE...ARE CANADIANS
> FIRST...or so we were lead to believe for so long.  PUT THE FLAG IN THE
> CLASSROOMS...BRING BACK THE BIBLE...I WOULD LIKE TO SEE NON-CHRISTIAN
> PASSAGES INTRODUCED TOO for the benefit of non-Christian kids in that
> particular classroom.
>
> Interesting...seeing the MultiCulturalism at Alderney Landing and at work at
> a certain bldg on Highfield Park Drive...IT'S ALL THERE...except
> Anglo-Saxon...hmmm...let's see NEW SCOTLAND.  NADA...NOTHING...for pete
> sake...we don't promote ourSELVES while endorsing others.  Methinks we're
> now scared to speak out for fear of being tagged with the R word.
>
> So...apologize...perhaps. Acknowledge it was wrong...yes. Expect anything
> similar in return...not too damn likely.

Why bother reasoning with those self-labelled white trash?

My advice to the Chinese -- in China and anywhere else -- is keep up with
your hard-working habit and become richer and richer.

The world is run by money, and Chinese are going in the right direction.

We make money; let them complain.




<fyfpoon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153984484.777822.214840@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Icarus wrote:
> > And THEeeeen...we can get all the Chinese gangs of our larger cities to
> > apologize for importing so much MORE wonderful crime and those awesome
> > drugs.
>
> ***The largest drug smuggling operation in BC is operated by Hell's
> Angel and these are not Chinese.
> ***  The consumers of the drugs so imported are mostly non-Chinese.
> With the market demand created by the non-Chinese consumers, how could
> any import be stopped?
> ***The people that made Hong Kong a British colony through opium
> smuggling were not Chinese.
>
> Go take a few courses from Affirmative Action classes.
>
> \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
>
>
>
>
>  Anyone remember the incident a few years ago in Moncton where one
> > chap had his achilles (sp?) tendon cut so he could not run away?
> >
> > Well everyone, as we all know the 'true' Canadian identity is LONG gone.
> > Those in power put E V E R Y T H I N G ahead of the beaver, Maple Leaf,
> > Mountie hats...the works and almost SHAME everyone else who doesn't. I
LOVE
> > the cultural identities but once here, we...and I DO say WE...ARE
CANADIANS
> > FIRST...or so we were lead to believe for so long.  PUT THE FLAG IN THE
> > CLASSROOMS...BRING BACK THE BIBLE...I WOULD LIKE TO SEE NON-CHRISTIAN
> > PASSAGES INTRODUCED TOO for the benefit of non-Christian kids in that
> > particular classroom.
> >
> > Interesting...seeing the MultiCulturalism at Alderney Landing and at
work at
> > a certain bldg on Highfield Park Drive...IT'S ALL THERE...except
> > Anglo-Saxon...hmmm...let's see NEW SCOTLAND.  NADA...NOTHING...for pete
> > sake...we don't promote ourSELVES while endorsing others.  Methinks
we're
> > now scared to speak out for fear of being tagged with the R word.
> >
> > So...apologize...perhaps. Acknowledge it was wrong...yes. Expect
anything
> > similar in return...not too damn likely.
>

for giving to canadian children. If you fvck and make children, it's your
responsibility to support them; and if children all grow up to be like the
retard trolls in this newsgroup, it's best their mothers drown them like
Yates did.



"Brian Bagnall" <bbagnall@mts.net> wrote in message
news:y3%wg.10724$YC3.7510@newsfe23.lga...
> Apparently Steven Harper agreed to apologize to the Chinese for something
> that happened 120 years ago. How Canadian. Someone runs us over with their
> car and we apologize for denting their bumper.
>
> It's amusing to see people today criticize the leaders of the past for
their
> decisions, as though we can say their decisions were wrong even though the
> times were far different. Our leaders at the time knew China was a huge
> place, Canada had a small population, and to allow unrestrained
immigration
> from China would soon overwhelm Canadians. Imagine how many would have
come
> if there was no head tax. We would be China II right now. Instead of the
> Western way flourishing here, the Eastern philosophy would flourish and
> Canada would be a far different place today.
>
> Let me tell you something bluntly: Those Chinese who paid the head tax
were
> lucky to come here. If a stranger asks to stay at your house and you say,
> "Okay, but you have to pay me $50 per day." you are *not* a bad person.
You
> don't have to apologize for asking for compensation. It is your home and
you
> are entitled to make whatever offer you want. Canada owes no apology to
> anyone they have allowed into the country. Apparently 81,000 came here and
> paid the tax. Enough said.
>
> - B
>
>

Qu'est ce FUCK is this idiot talking about??? Maybe someone should drown 
this idiot now the way Yates did.
"chang" <chang@superrace.com> wrote in message 
news:Fj6yg.56$m44.15565@weber.videotron.net...
> for giving to canadian children. If you fvck and make children, it's your
> responsibility to support them; and if children all grow up to be like the
> retard trolls in this newsgroup, it's best their mothers drown them like
> Yates did.
>
>
>
> "Brian Bagnall" <bbagnall@mts.net> wrote in message
> news:y3%wg.10724$YC3.7510@newsfe23.lga...
>> Apparently Steven Harper agreed to apologize to the Chinese for something
>> that happened 120 years ago. How Canadian. Someone runs us over with 
>> their
>> car and we apologize for denting their bumper.
>>
>> It's amusing to see people today criticize the leaders of the past for
> their
>> decisions, as though we can say their decisions were wrong even though 
>> the
>> times were far different. Our leaders at the time knew China was a huge
>> place, Canada had a small population, and to allow unrestrained
> immigration
>> from China would soon overwhelm Canadians. Imagine how many would have
> come
>> if there was no head tax. We would be China II right now. Instead of the
>> Western way flourishing here, the Eastern philosophy would flourish and
>> Canada would be a far different place today.
>>
>> Let me tell you something bluntly: Those Chinese who paid the head tax
> were
>> lucky to come here. If a stranger asks to stay at your house and you say,
>> "Okay, but you have to pay me $50 per day." you are *not* a bad person.
> You
>> don't have to apologize for asking for compensation. It is your home and
> you
>> are entitled to make whatever offer you want. Canada owes no apology to
>> anyone they have allowed into the country. Apparently 81,000 came here 
>> and
>> paid the tax. Enough said.
>>
>> - B
>>
>>
>
> 

"Not Me" <Wouldnty@like2know.com> wrote in message 
news:ys8yg.27489$pu3.364767@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> Qu'est ce FUCK is this idiot talking about??? Maybe someone should drown 
> this idiot now the way Yates did.
> "chang" <chang@superrace.com> wrote in message 
> news:Fj6yg.56$m44.15565@weber.videotron.net...
>> for giving to canadian children. If you fvck and make children, it's your
>> responsibility to support them; and if children all grow up to be like 
>> the
>> retard trolls in this newsgroup, it's best their mothers drown them like
>> Yates did.
>>
>>
>>
>> "Brian Bagnall" <bbagnall@mts.net> wrote in message
>> news:y3%wg.10724$YC3.7510@newsfe23.lga...
>>> Apparently Steven Harper agreed to apologize to the Chinese for 
>>> something
>>> that happened 120 years ago. How Canadian. Someone runs us over with 
>>> their
>>> car and we apologize for denting their bumper.
>>>
>>> It's amusing to see people today criticize the leaders of the past for
>> their
>>> decisions, as though we can say their decisions were wrong even though 
>>> the
>>> times were far different. Our leaders at the time knew China was a huge
>>> place, Canada had a small population, and to allow unrestrained
>> immigration
>>> from China would soon overwhelm Canadians. Imagine how many would have
>> come
>>> if there was no head tax. We would be China II right now. Instead of the
>>> Western way flourishing here, the Eastern philosophy would flourish and
>>> Canada would be a far different place today.
>>>
>>> Let me tell you something bluntly: Those Chinese who paid the head tax
>> were
>>> lucky to come here. If a stranger asks to stay at your house and you 
>>> say,
>>> "Okay, but you have to pay me $50 per day." you are *not* a bad person.
>> You
>>> don't have to apologize for asking for compensation. It is your home and
>> you
>>> are entitled to make whatever offer you want. Canada owes no apology to
>>> anyone they have allowed into the country. Apparently 81,000 came here 
>>> and
>>> paid the tax. Enough said.
>>>
>>> - B
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> 

"Margie" <Me@hereandnow.com> wrote in message 
news:ux9yg.134406$A8.50102@clgrps12...
>
> "Not Me" <Wouldnty@like2know.com> wrote in message 
> news:ys8yg.27489$pu3.364767@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>> Qu'est ce FUCK is this idiot talking about??? Maybe someone should drown 
>> this idiot now the way Yates did.
>> "chang" <chang@superrace.com> wrote in message 
>> news:Fj6yg.56$m44.15565@weber.videotron.net...
>>> for giving to canadian children. If you fvck and make children, it's 
>>> your
>>> responsibility to support them; and if children all grow up to be like 
>>> the
>>> retard trolls in this newsgroup, it's best their mothers drown them like
>>> Yates did.


I suppose it's best if I actually respond to this rather then post nothing. 
(Sorry about that by the way).

So, did someone pee in your Corn Flakes today?  Comments like yours is 
unacceptable here.  Go pound sand.

Oh, and in case you are wondering if I am one of these people you're 
speaking of, you would be incorrect. 

"Margie" <Me@hereandnow.com> wrote in message 
news:9A9yg.134407$A8.94180@clgrps12...
>
> "Margie" <Me@hereandnow.com> wrote in message 
> news:ux9yg.134406$A8.50102@clgrps12...
>>
>> "Not Me" <Wouldnty@like2know.com> wrote in message 
>> news:ys8yg.27489$pu3.364767@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>>> Qu'est ce FUCK is this idiot talking about??? Maybe someone should drown 
>>> this idiot now the way Yates did.
>>> "chang" <chang@superrace.com> wrote in message 
>>> news:Fj6yg.56$m44.15565@weber.videotron.net...
>>>> for giving to canadian children. If you fvck and make children, it's 
>>>> your
>>>> responsibility to support them; and if children all grow up to be like 
>>>> the
>>>> retard trolls in this newsgroup, it's best their mothers drown them 
>>>> like
>>>> Yates did.
>
>
> I suppose it's best if I actually respond to this rather then post 
> nothing. (Sorry about that by the way).
>
> So, did someone pee in your Corn Flakes today?  Comments like yours is 
> unacceptable here.  Go pound sand.
>
> Oh, and in case you are wondering if I am one of these people you're 
> speaking of, you would be incorrect.
Who are you referring to?