Re: POwer scheme in XP

Article View: hk.comp.pc

Article #277

#277

From: Jim O'Leary
Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2002 00:07

6 lines
1246 bytes

I can't answer your question, but can verify the problem since I have
the same one.  It's the kind of obvious behavior that Microsoft should
have tested more thoroughly.  I, too, look forward to hearing from
anyone who can identify a work-around.

Jim O

Technical Details

Message-ID: <10e8c846.0208021607.6a158cd9@posting.google.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail

References: <3D43B2DC.64C83CCB@email.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 100b6e,1e5a8e77c90eca83
X-Google-Attributes: gid100b6e,public
X-Google-Thread: f4db5,1e5a8e77c90eca83
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4db5,public
X-Google-Thread: 10c4e6,1e5a8e77c90eca83
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c4e6,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-02 17:07:57 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: jimol@msn.com (Jim O'Leary)
Newsgroups: hk.comp.pc,hk.comp.chinese,hk.comp.software
Subject: Re: POwer scheme in XP
Date: 2 Aug 2002 17:07:57 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <10e8c846.0208021607.6a158cd9@posting.google.com>
References: <3D43B2DC.64C83CCB@email.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.40.136.74
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1028333277 7347 127.0.0.1 (3 Aug 2002 00:07:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Aug 2002 00:07:57 GMT

Reply to Parent Message