Article View: hk.general
Article #498Re: Sex b4 marriage, what's your opinion?
From: I'm a good man
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 00:00
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 00:00
36 lines
2317 bytes
2317 bytes
Ka-Cheong LEUNG (kcleung@cs.ust.hk) wrote:
: However, if it is really the case, how the one treats the another half
: when they're old (such that they fail to perform sexual activities). You should
: note that the couples have to live together, and they cannot do sexual
: activities 24 hours every day!!!
When we talk about a normal issue, pls do not go into extreme case, okay?
When both are old, they don't need sex any more. It's not the point we
have been on.
: The problem here is due to the lack of sufficient communications between
: the two. If they know well each other, each should understand and consent the
: problems and drawbacks of the others; otherwise, they should rather break the
: lover relationship down.
If every pair of couples can have such high educated sense, I agree with
you exactly.
: Here, I don't mean that this could not affect the happeniness of the
: marriage. However, I want to stress that this is NOT the only criteria to
: evaluate the utilities of the marriage!!! Maybe you're right, from your
I think no one here ever says "sex is the only criteria to evaluate...."
So, don't discuss on this.
: viewpoint. But I regard you simply as a love-player, not really as a lover!
: I do not like to go to "fast food shop" to have lunch and dinner!!!
:)
Rgds,
Ah Fung (Work inhumanely hard......)
More: pls "finger mfchan@cs.cuhk.hk | more" or "http://www.cs.cuhk.hk/~mfchan"
--- Dept. of Committing Suicide, The Cruelty University of Hong Kong ---
���䤤��j�� �q�l�p��Ǩt
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<474s7f$94q@hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<46o6tu$q82@hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk> <470gcm$1rk@news.ust.hk> <471d8e$338@hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk> <471rpm$7r3@news.ust.hk> <471ruh$84c@news.ust.hk> <472jk4$fc2@hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk> <472rf5$crt@news.ust.hk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: fa4d1,2ccf7a17f5d84048 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa4d1,public X-Google-Thread: 104660,2ccf7a17f5d84048 X-Google-Attributes: gid104660,public From: s936067@sgiind10.csc.cuhk.hk (I'm a good man) Subject: Re: Sex b4 marriage, what's your opinion? Date: 1995/10/31 Message-ID: <474s7f$94q@hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk> X-Deja-AN: 118304195 references: <46o6tu$q82@hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk> <470gcm$1rk@news.ust.hk> <471d8e$338@hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk> <471rpm$7r3@news.ust.hk> <471ruh$84c@news.ust.hk> <472jk4$fc2@hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk> <472rf5$crt@news.ust.hk> organization: CUIA <See U in the Net!> followup-to: hk.general,cuhk.forum newsgroups: hk.general,cuhk.forum