Re: Dog Friendly Restaurants

Article View: houston.eats

Article #799

#799

From: Chicagodogs
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 16:19

26 lines
2968 bytes

> MC:  There are plenty of stupid laws that are forced on us but health
> and sanitation laws are generally acceptable.
> 
> I like dogs and Jack probably does too.  Because someone, and society,
> has higher sanitation standards than you does not mean they do not
> dislike dogs.
> 
> It is simply that restaurants are not the place to take your pet and
> transmit your pet's crap & germs to the eating surfaces.
> 

> What if 10 people brought their dogs into a restaurant?  Do you still
> think this behavior is still acceptable?  How about 15 dogs?


Actually, I have eaten at a restaurant with 5-6 dogs at once... They
were not at the table, but right next to it outside a fence (slatted).
No one complained- actually, the people at the next table started
talking to us because of it. They lived in Paris and were commenting
on how much more dog-friendly their city was, they were surprised to
see the dogs and also mentioned how nice and well-behaved they were
(which several people passing by did also.) These were all therapy
dogs, we were having a get-together on the last day of animal-assisted
therapy before the summer break.

Lizzi

Technical Details

Message-ID: <f6782a4b.0305190819.1ece153c@posting.google.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail

References:

<XObta.44786$8Z3.1178117@twister.austin.rr.com> <3EB56BD0.15D9F659@DoGLoverREMOVE.com> <99fta.37822$rH.1136206@twister.austin.rr.com> <3EB58475.51C392E3@DoGloverREMOVE.com> <7Tfta.28539$8e7.1233487@twister.austin.rr.com> <3EB59306.6840BD60@nospam.com> <4Hgta.1852$fm2.321@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com> <3EB59C42.714DA32C@nospam.com> <2mlcbvcq40g40rsfob7jqsaeb5ur433mg8@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 110204,1b28dd7c2090496f
X-Google-Attributes: gid110204,public
X-Google-Thread: 108723,1b28dd7c2090496f
X-Google-Attributes: gid108723,public
X-Google-Thread: 112c59,1b28dd7c2090496f
X-Google-Attributes: gid112c59,public
X-Google-Thread: 10611e,1b28dd7c2090496f
X-Google-Attributes: gid10611e,public
X-Google-Thread: 10bf60,1b28dd7c2090496f
X-Google-Attributes: gid10bf60,public
X-Google-Thread: 10c1f9,67880e762faca2aa
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c1f9,public
X-Google-Thread: 115ce9,1b28dd7c2090496f
X-Google-Attributes: gid115ce9,public
X-Google-Thread: fb747,bc52c32b1c9e6b5b
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb747,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-19 09:19:22 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: chicagocanine@aol.com (Chicagodogs)
Newsgroups: houston.eats,rec.pets.dogs,chi.eats,la.eats,seattle.eats,dfw.eats,nyc.food,sat.food
Subject: Re: Dog Friendly Restaurants
Date: 19 May 2003 09:19:21 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <f6782a4b.0305190819.1ece153c@posting.google.com>
References: <XObta.44786$8Z3.1178117@twister.austin.rr.com> <3EB56BD0.15D9F659@DoGLoverREMOVE.com> <99fta.37822$rH.1136206@twister.austin.rr.com> <3EB58475.51C392E3@DoGloverREMOVE.com> <7Tfta.28539$8e7.1233487@twister.austin.rr.com> <3EB59306.6840BD60@nospam.com> <4Hgta.1852$fm2.321@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com> <3EB59C42.714DA32C@nospam.com> <2mlcbvcq40g40rsfob7jqsaeb5ur433mg8@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.148.73.141
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1053361162 14272 127.0.0.1 (19 May 2003 16:19:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 May 2003 16:19:22 GMT

Reply to Parent Message