🚀 go-pugleaf

MC you are what we have seen since the days of BBSs.....an instigator!
You are here to do nothing but stir up crap with outragious comments.
Thanks for the entertainment.

On Mon, 05 May 2003 13:37:35 GMT, Maural Compass <MCompass@nospam.com>
wrote:

>borus wrote:
>> 
>> On Sun, 04 May 2003 23:07:22 GMT, Maural Compass <MCompass@nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> MC:  There are plenty of stupid laws that are forced on us but health
>> and sanitation laws are generally acceptable.
>> 
>Look, I have to breathe second hand smoke in Houston, but I can't
>bring my dog into a restaurant, you have your imposed health rules
>off-kilter. 

They aren't my rules dude! They are society's.
 Smoke in a restaurant DOES NOT empower you to break any law.  
This stupid logic is that of a child or a mob.

> I'd rather have my dog poop in the restaurant than
>breathe second hand smoke.  

Take a pole to see how many want to smell dog shit while they eat? 

Even better get a movement (ha) going to have non-dog shit areas in
restaurants, like non-skoking sections.

>I don't think there has been one study about dogs causing disease.
Then if you haven't seen one, one must not exist.  

>> I like dogs and Jack probably does too.  Because someone, and society,
>> has higher sanitation standards than you does not mean they do not
>> dislike dogs.
>> 
>I don't believe one word of what you say. 
We all know that!
> I don't think Jack likes
>dogs and you don't either.  
Who cares?
>Don't gald-hand or patronize me buster.
Sorry, you should be pitied until you grow up.

>> It is simply that restaurants are not the place to take your pet and
>> transmit your pet's crap & germs to the eating surfaces.
>> 
>
>Humans have more germs thand dogs.  What about Typhoid Mary?  Was she
>a dog?  I don't think so.  Next sanitation freaks like you will have
>us wiping the soles off our shoes off with disinfectant.  

>I don't
>know what it is a bout you dog haters.

Public health and basic sanitation is not as simple as blaming it on
"dog haters".
Your fixation with defending your doggie problem is clouding your
ability to see your actions as they effect others.  Again, grow up!
>
>> You are forcing people to be civil and comment that your dog is cute
>> rather than expressing their disgust over your conduct and violation
>> of public law.
>> 
>I am always civil.
Of course you are, nothing calmer than a criminal with a bitch in a
restaurant.

> It the people in this group calling dog-lovers
>idiots that have lost their civility.

Don't you hate people who 'call' law breakers idots.  
Personally I admire thinking people who can draw the conclusion that a
person IS an idot by analyzing their conduct and words.

>  I don't know what law you
>are talking about.  Iha ve never seen a sign posted in Houston that
>says no dogs and will continue to bring my dog to dog-friendly
>restaurants.  

Ignorance of the law is no excuse.

>> What if 10 people brought their dogs into a restaurant?  Do you still
>> think this behavior is still acceptable?  How about 15 dogs?
>
>Yes.  As long as their is room and no one will trip over the leash.

Ha!  I rest my case!  Thanks for the hoot dude, you should take this
act on the road.

>What if I have 15 kids, would you stop me from entering the restaurant.

Can't assume anything with you.... human "kids" or goats?

If human, I believe society protects you and your litter's rights in
this case. 

>If they can put diaper assists in bathroom they can at least let me
>bring a plastic bag inside, as I always clean up.

I'm going to be civil.

WOOF WOOF