🚀 go-pugleaf

Mimereader2@yahoo.com wrote:
> The following article, 'On the Controversy of Pure National
Socialism'
> by H. Michael Barrett, is primarily written for Americans:
>
>
> The correct path of pro-White activism requires the bringing of
veteran
> legionism into the politics and social life of Pioneer Little Europe.
>
> Cultists cannot and will not do that, as they are content with a mere
> recycling of someone else's militant tradition and all the beaten up
> baggage that encumbers it.
>
> They have a less complete loyalty to their own nation's militant
> tradition, and tend to gain few representatives who have military
> experience at all.
>
> They develop a kind of leadership that does not greatly value
> negotiation, peace, or the camaraderie that's good for the safety of
> their rank and file; for lacking more traumatic experiences with
> conflict those values do not come to maturity.
>
> Our opponents have long dreaded the return of a native legionism to
its
> role within White racialist politics. They are much less fearful of
any
> cultism, which many describe as another nation's mimic and not its
> counterpart, but that is a tangle for the historians to unravel as
our
> main concern is practical politics:
>
> Our opponents sometimes call us "nazis" or "fascists," but the
builders
> of Pioneer Little Europe are actually legionnaires within a much more
> modern cultural revival.
>
> That even Hitler himself required a fresh movement, and would not
have
> imported or recyled something else, is easy to demonstrate from his
own
> book Mein Kampf:
>
> "I had long since made up my mind to take up political activity; that
> this could only be a new movement was also clear to me, so far only
the
> instigation for action had not come."H.M 1939 pg 299
>
> "With this the first leading principles and lines of direction for a
> fight which was to do away with a veritable host of handed-down
> conceptions and opinions and with unclear, even injurious goals were
> issued."H.M. 1939 pg 563
>
> "The more practically undefinable this conception is (folkish), the
> more and freer interpretation its permits, the more increases also
the
> possibility of having recourse to it."H.M. 1939 pg 501
>
> "Secondly, however, one should remember the following: every and even
> the best idea becomes a danger as soon as it pretends to be an end in
> itself, but in reality only represents a means to an end; for myself
> and all true National Socialists there is only one doctrine: people
and
> country."H.M. 1939 pg 288
>
> For those who may interpret this as a "temporary view" of Hitler's,
it
> is repeated during the war:
>
> I am firmly opposed to any attempt to export National Socialism. Ref:
> Hitler, Adolf 'The Secret Conversations of Adolf Hitler' New York,
New
> York: Farrar, Straus and Young, N. Y. 1953 pg 397 (Part 223 of the
> Bormann-Vermerke notes for the 20th of May, 1942)
>
> And then just as clearly at the end of his career:
>
> The National Socialist doctrine, as I have always proclaimed, is not
> for export. It was conceived for the German people. (Hitler-Bormann
> Documents, Feb. 21, 1945)
>
> Then another source on the same quote but with a different date:
>
> The National Socialist doctrine, as I have always proclaimed, is not
> for export. It was conceived for the German people. Ref: Hitler,
Adolf
> 'The Testament of Adolf Hitler' February- April 1945: L. Craig Fraser
> edition, circa 1972 page 58 (xiii)
>
> Then there are the extracts from the Speech by Dr. Goebbels,
September
> 10, 1938: Never have we left anyone in doubt that National-Socialism
is
> not for export.Refocuments on International Affairs, vol.II, 1938,
> pp.17-19.
>
> Then this: "Concerned that the success of the National Socialist
system
> was subverting the less successful Capitalist "democracies" the Times
> [1 April 1938] charged Hitlers Germany with exporting their superior
> system:
>
> "We are reproached with carrying on propoganda. No, National
Socialism
> is to us such a dear, holy German cause that we feel inclined to pray
> that God may keep it primarily for our own people. Let the other
> nations foster their own ideals." FRANKFURT, 31 MARCH 1938.
>
> Diana Mitford Mosley, an inner circle friend of Hitler's who spoke
> German (unlike Oswald Mosley until his wartime imprisonment), also
> confirmed this after the war.
> http://www.oswaldmosley.com/unused/lovedones1.html
>
> >From the Canadian Zundelsite comes this: "We MUST become
nationalists
> and fight for the rights of our people. To do less would be abject
> surrender. The Nazis themselves used to say that National Socialism
was
> not for export. They were correct."
> http://www.zundelsite.org/english/z...811/981110.html
>
> And Louisiana's favorite son, former governer Huey P. Long, is often
> quoted saying something quite similar, though it has many variations:
>
> "If Fascism (or Germany's unique variety of it, National Socialism)
> comes to the United States it will be on a program of Americanism."
> http://quotes.fablis.com/index.php/Huey_P._Long
>
> Although this point is clear, it is also natural to ask why so many
> non-Germans become confused about it.
>
> In part this is because many non-Germans still misinterpret the
> National Socialist government's prewar campaign against the Treaty of
> Versailles, which extended into each of the territories it claimed.
>
> Many non-Germans sources slyly protested that this was "foreign
> interference," an exporting of National Socialism, but that wasn't
how
> most Germans or the National Socialists viewed the controversy.
>
> Protests were also registered whenever any self-styled "NS group"
arose
> in Europe or elsewhere, but those were not created or controlled by
> Germany.
>
> Prior to the war the latter often caused public relation problems for
> Germany, and during the war they submitted to Germany, but at no time
> were they on the kind of equal footing that would have resulted if
> National Socialism really was being exported.
>
> Our own movement's ideology is not German or Italian, and our nation
is
> linked by language mostly through Britain and Ireland as our doorways
> to Europe.
>
> The most important part of our people's cultural revival is what they
> work to create, as they declare the political unity and rights of a
new
> people, not what they less effortlessly consume from their various
and
> more competitive past heritages.
>
> The cultural roots of our folk are from various sources, so we cannot
> afford to give a dominate role to any one creed of the past, but
> extract the best from all of them.
>
> We reject a politics desperately hinged to revisionist history, but
> will strive to reassert what is true in history - warts and all.
>
> Our movement does not possess an answer to every controversy of the
> past, as it is new and with the future, so it will only carry what is
> potentially useful from the past.
>
> Visit Stormfront to print out a free copy of the entire PLE
prospectus,
> and use the "Advance Scout" forum there to either announce your own
> interest in local community building - or to find others who already
> believe it's the wave of the future.
> __________________
> PLEs are OPEN communities for all WNs with many different pro-White
> spins within, so Stormfront does not seek legal control or
> responsibility for any PLE built, nor is proof of existence given
about
> any PLE project alleged to be in its first or "invisible" stage.
>
> Stormfront's 'Advance Scout' is the main PLE forum
> http://www.stormfront.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=65
> And the PLE prospectus is here: http://heritagetoday.us/euro/ple.html

This is a good concept and one that will serve to preserve and protect
our ethnic heritage.

Paul