🚀 go-pugleaf

For reasons only known to Him and *Titix*, this appeared:

> <johnwesley55@lycos.com> wrote in message
> news:1151407953.442460.3680@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
>> TwistyCreek wrote:
>>> "Ramon F Herrera" <ramon@conexus.net> wrote in message
>>> news:1151253309.867297.178030@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>>>> jimj122680@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>> Beaners don't vote much.  All beaners care about is:  babies, soccer,
>>>>> gangs, spraying graffiti, more babies, partying, littering.  Look at
>>>>> every beaner country, a worthless pile of shit.  You worthless trash
>>>>> have to invade our country because your country is such a joke.  Then
>>>>> when you come here, you turn our neighborhoods into 3rd world slums.
>>>>> YOU PEOPLE ARE ANIMALS.
>>>>
>>>> And what are you? Vegetable or mineral?
>>>>
>>>> Anywho...  You keep on counting that we don't vote, igonore the
>>>> statistics and demography. What does it feel to be sleeping at *your*
>>>> wheel?  We are pretty much awake on ours.
>>>
>>> Awake on meth, verdad?  You wouldn't be here were it not for companies
>>> busing in their beaner workforces to work for dog food pay and no benefits.
>>> Meatpacking plants in the Midwest and Great Plains are the worst offenders,
>>> with worker longevity averaging 91 days.  That a 400% annual turnover, and
>>> if immigrants are accused of taking American jobs from Americans, it's
>>> apparent that the wetbacks don't want them either.
>>>
>>> Lexington, Nebraska (pop. 7,000) is a good example.  In 1990, Iowa Beef
>>> Packers, which supplies Mickey D's with frozen beef patties, opened a
>>> slaughterhouse there and within a year the town had the highest crime rate
>>> in the state, thanks to the imported me-no-speekee-English workforce.
>>> "White flight" set in and the beaners took over.  In 1990 Lexington was
>>> 4.5% Hispanic.  By 1993 it was 30% Hispanic.  In 1996 it was 50%, with the
>>> remaining locals nicknaming it "Mexington."  Since the workers had no
>>> health
>>> insurance, whenever they got sick or hurt Medicaid had to pick up the tab
>>> and it put a crushing burden on the local hospitals.
>>>
>>> Because of the high turnover, employers are constantly on the lookout for
>>> fresh warm bodies and nearly all cities along the U.S./Mexico border have
>>> hiring agencies who'll send busloads of ostensibly legal aliens to wherever
>>> in the country they're needed.  About ten years ago, GFI America, Inc.
>>> (Dairy Queen and Cracker Barrel's meat supplier) needed workers for a plant
>>> in Minneapolis, so it sent recruiters to a Texas border town and promised
>>> the amigos steady work and housing.  Thirty-nine of them were shipped to
>>> Minnesota in a rented bus and then they were dropped off across the street
>>> from a homeless shelter.  Since the beaners had no money, the shelter had
>>> no
>>> choice but to take them in.  GFI offered to pay the shelter $17 for each
>>> worker plus all the hamburger they could eat, but the offer was refused.
>>> The company's scheme to use the homeless shelter as worker housing
>>> backfired
>>> when the local media picked up the story.
>>>
>>> It seems like the exploitation of cheap immigrant labor has come full
>>> circle.  In 1906 it was common practice for bosses to keep their immigrant
>>> employees working long, grueling hours by supplying them with cocaine,
>>> which
>>> was cheap and legal back then (one ounce of pharmaceutical coke could be
>>> legally purchased at a drugstore in 1900 for five dollars, about a hundred
>>> bucks in today's money).  In 2006 the drug of choice is methamphetamine,
>>> and
>>> it's being handed out to Jose and Maria in packing plants and sweatshops
>>> throughout the country.  I doubt if Norman Rockwell ever thought that his
>>> little picture-postcards towns throughout rural America would have
>>> underground economies fueled by meth labs whose main customers can't even
>>> read or write in their native tongue, let alone English.
>>
>> Coming to a town or neighborhood near you.
>>
>> http://www.deportaliens.com/  Deport Aliens
>>
>> John

> It is sad. One can see the desperation of the person that will do anything
> to get a miserable amount of money.
> Anybody in that position would do the same to survive. Now, who do we blame
> for letting these people
> come here?  Yes, the people we put in office.

For the most part, Caca del Toro, but I share your wishful thinking.  You /know/ 
it's politics, and in a mid-term election year no less.  Democrats are 
/supposed/  to be the "friend" of the "poor and downtrodden", and Republicans 
can't afford to alienate any more of the Latino vote, let alone the rest of the 
demographic if they are to retain any semblance of power in federal, state and 
local levels, even though there is a fairly significant number of Latinos who 
would and do support enforcement of immigration laws.

Why isn't this government not
> going to these working places
> and look for the illegals and deport them and fine the company that hired
> them or even imprison the person
> that put them to work?

Exactly the point - and it *is* being done on a limited basis to some success - 
but because you *know* that the liberalistas would go apeshit and further fan 
the flames of ignorantly and ridiculously calling this a fascist state, even 
though this would be a *huge* step in stemming this growing problem.  "Damned if 
you do, damned if you don't" for those people.

>Let's not bring race into this mess because this
> should not be confused or mix with racism.

Racism isn't even remotely the issue.  But I do wholeheartedly agree that the 
hammer should be dropped on those corporations who hire these illegals and 
provide them with the incentive to come here, surpressing wages and yes, bumping 
Americans out of jobs which they *would* take, ideally, if the wages were 
competetive.  I-9 (citizenship status) forms are a joke;  they're almost /never/ 
enforced when a given social security number, for example, is found to be 
fraudulent (having been bought for several hundred dollars on the black market). 
It's the fact that these illegals are just that;  criminals in the fact that 
they flout the laws of this country to come here in the first place by bypassing 
all the laws already set in place to do so legally.  And someone expects me to 
have even a modicum of pity for these people?  Even a sizable percentage of 
American citizens of Latino origin agree with this.

> No illegal should be in the country regardless of his/her race.

Again, agreed.  And, don't get me started on "this is a nation of immigrants". 
Sure, they all (or at least the vast majority) came here LEGALLY!  This is *not* 
to say that they aren't welcome, just go through the process like you're 
supposed to and like everyone else did before you.

> BLAME YOUR GOVERNMENT

...and I hope you include _all_ levels and _all_ parties, and that this isn't 
just some veiled anti-Bush tirade.

> DON'T BLAME THE ILLEGAL, he is just trying to survive and he is a victim of
> the corporation's greed.

Not exactly - and I despise the whole "Dr. Phil-type" syndrome of "victimhood" - 
but while we're on the subject, why don't all the pity-for-the-illegals 
shmeckolas get on Mexi-hole's president Vicente Fox's remarkably corrupt back 
(and off Bush's) for leading such a decrepit nation down the crapper in the 
first place in providing a further incentive for its citizens to leave it, 
huh?!?  Western Union (and other money-wiring concerns) are making a shload of 
money from these illegals sending billions of U.S. dollars back to their home 
countries instead of spending it here and benefitting the U.S. economy.

Not to mention all the outright criminals who come here, not looking for jobs, 
but for new - and substantially wealthier - victims.  Another *fact* that the 
boo-hooers often overlook.

-- 
I'm *Not* Mentok 



Inviato da X-Privat.Org - Registrazione gratuita http://www.x-privat.org/join.php