🚀 go-pugleaf

Kent Wills wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:12:37 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
> 
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:42:56 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 03:44:55 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:06:37 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:42:56 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:59:02 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 	Huh? I don't even see anything even remotely Bob related here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Odd that you seem to.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Odd that Bob lives in Az. and YOU are now posting here, instead of your 
>>>>>>>>>>>> usual gig in AFBL.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 	Odd that I'm reading and posting from ia.talk.misc.  I don't
>>>>>>>>>>> check AFBL all that much anymore.  Once a week is the norm, unless
>>>>>>>>>>> something exciting catches me.
>>>>>>>>>> Odd that so MANY of your posts are there:
>>>>>>>>> 	Odd that you dishonestly failed to mention that the bulk were
>>>>>>>>> cross posts from misc.legal.  In fact, when one clicks on my name, one
>>>>>>>>> finds only ONE post that wasn't made from misc.legal in the first
>>>>>>>>> list. 
>>>>>>>> I don;t care how many OTHER groups were on the x-post list, you were 
>>>>>>>> primarily posting about BOB!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 	Not so.  The Trusted Bible thread has had no mention of
>>>>>>> Lar$on.  Same with the multiple Cameron Brown threads.
>>>>>> Kent, you have been BUSTED!
>>>>>>
>>>>> 	Not in the eyes of any sane person.
>>>> In the archives of google, LOL!
>>>>
>>> 	And most of those who visit Google are sane, so most wouldn't
>>> see it as you do.
>> Sorry kent, the facts stand as posted.
> 
> 	Wrong again.  You lose.

You're back in there today too, at it again, aren't ya?

>>>>>> You ARE and have BEEN an AFBL mainstay!
>>>>>>
>>>>> 	I'm a bit of a regular.  I try to visit once a week.  More if
>>>>> something exciting is going on.
>>>>> 	The simple truth is, you post there far more than I do.
>>>> Nope.
>>> 	Yep.  Not counting cross-posts, you post there more often than
>>> I.  
>> Nope, another lie.
> 
> 	Check the stats, using ALL of your nyms.

Do it for me.

> 
>>>>>>>>> 	The next most recent AFBL post listed is for Feb. 4.
>>>>>>>>> 	Now quite what one would expect for an obsessed person.
>>>>>>>> Squirm worm, it's your record on display:
>>>>>>> 	And those who wish to do so can see for themselves that very
>>>>>>> few posts are about Lar$on.  He's not the issue he once was.
>>>>>> Obssessor tries to squirm out.
>>>>> 	You are?
>>>> YOU ARE, YOU SICK OCD BOB FREAK.
>>> 	Where did you get your degree in Psychology?
>> I wouldn't need one to observe your fixation on Bob...
> 
> 	What fixation?  YOU are the one who brought him up, not me.  

Oh come now, you've had a hard on for him ever since he brought you to 
Christ, and then let you down.

>>> If you are
>>> depending upon the tentative diagnosis of another, from which
>>> University did he or she get his or her degree?
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/about?hl=en
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This month's top posters
>>>>>>>>>> 65 	  	for...@it.com
>>>>>>>>>> 63 	  	compu...@gmail.com (kent)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> All time top posters
>>>>>>>>>> 7597 	  	jacob...@pacbell.net
>>>>>>>>>> 5505 	  	Range...@concentric.net
>>>>>>>>>> 5109 	  	j...@thecodezone.com
>>>>>>>>>> 2895 	  	compu...@gmail.com (kent)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your opinions have proven to be little more 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than revisionist slime from the get go.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 	I post the truth.  You don't have to like it, but you do have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to accept it.
>>>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn't know the truth if it walked up and bit you in the ass.
>>>>>>>>>>> 	Projection transference noted.
>>>>>>>>>> Psychobabble bullshit noted.
>>>>>>>>> 	It's called truth.  
>>>>>>>> You have none to offer, never do.
>>>>>>> 	Projection is a bad thing, Sam.
>>>>>> So why do you?
>>>>> 	Please provide just one instance, 
>>>> You're doing it now.
>>> 	Transference is also a bad thing, Sam.
>> Do tell, well work on your projection first, ok?
> 
> 	Please cite one example of my committing projection.  Just
> one.  And a REAL one, not one of your delusional examples.

See above.

>>>>>>>>>>>>> 	And what do you have against LEGAL immigration?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 	You must,
>>>>>>>>>> You lie again, as per always.
>>>>>>>>> 	You took a contrary position to Just Cocky, and his position
>>>>>>>>> has consistently been PRO legal immigration.
>>>>>>>> Mine is not against it either.
>>>>>>> 	Then explain why you took a contrary position to Just Cocky.
>>>>>>> It doesn't make any sense.
>>>>>> Then quote where I did, assfuck.
>>>>>>
>>>>> 	Are you claiming you haven't done so?  Are you in agreement
>>>> with Just Cocky?  If so, I misunderstood your posts, and apologize.
>>>>
>>>> Are you proving?
>>>>
>>>> No...looks like you're not, fuck off child.
>>> 	I asked a question.  Why can't you offer a simple and direct
>>> answer?
>> Cite your proof or fuck off.
> 
> 	Look above where I wrote, 

Cite my "contrary position" doof.

>>>>>>>>>>> since you have taken a position contrary to Just
>>>>>>>>>>> Cocky and me.  We are very much PRO legal immigration.
>>>>>>>>>> Of course you are, it's how YOU got here isn't it?
>>>>>>>>> 	It's how *I* got here.  I don't know the circumstances of Just
>>>>>>>>> Cocky.  He may have been born in the U.S.
>>>>>>>> And we need more responsive quotas and standards - that's my position.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What say you?
>>>>>>> 	I say it's far too difficult as it is. 
>>>>>> You mean you agree with me, or disagree, or what?
>>>>> 	My position is Pro legal immigration.  I'm no longer sure what
>>>>> you position is.
>>>> I stated it enough times you lying scumbuckewt, fuck you.
>>> 	So you are against it.  Got it.
>> See, that need to lie is just ingrained in you.
> 
> 	Everyone has seen how you disagree with Just Cocky and me, and
> our position is pro legal immigration.

It may be, and if true it doesn't conflict with any basic belief I have.

>>>>>> You want a revolving door with no standards?
>>>>> 	Certainly not.  And nothing I've written can be interpreted to
>>>>> mean that.
>>>> GOOD!
>>>>
>>>> You just want "more" right?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe with NO limits eh?
>>> 	See above.
>> I see you squirming.
> 
> 	You're delusional.

Squirm on.

>>>>>> Stupid piece of Iowa shit.
>>>>> 	And yet I'm still your superior in every way.
>>>> You couldn't be my superior if you became a Catholic, you dumb mother.
>>> 	And yet I am 
>> not...
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The tone of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your posts gives me the impression that you are against it.  If I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your position wrong, I apologize.  If I have it correct, please
>>>>>>>>>>>>> explain why LEGAL immigration is bad.
>>>>>>>>>>>> LEGAL immigration could be better if we had a more responsive quota 
>>>>>>>>>>>> allocation based on real world skills needs in the US.
>>>>>>>>>>> 	Since legal immigration is what Just Cocky has been promoting,
>>>>>>>>>>> please explain the beef you have with him.
>>>>>>>>>> Since I just explained my position, explain what beef YOU have with it!
>>>>>>>>> 	As I've stated, I'm very much PRO legal immigration.  I
>>>>>>>>> encourage anyone who wishes to come here to do so, but to do so
>>>>>>>>> LEGALLY.  Just Cocky has taken the same position.  As such, I can not
>>>>>>>>> have a beef with his position.
>>>>>>>> I don't want just "anyone".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I want people whose work skills and desires make them GOOD candidates.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 	When I arrived here I had no real skills.
>>>>>> Seems that hasn't changed much.
>>>>>>
>>>>> 	I must be doing something right. 
>>>> Marrying a competent woman is a start, true...
>>> 	She is great.  There is no denying that.
>>
>> If a suspect judge of character...
> 
> 	While we've never discussed you, I'm sure she would find you
> as much a simpleton as I.  

See what I mean!