🚀 go-pugleaf

Kent Wills wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:06:37 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
> 
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:42:56 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:59:02 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> 	Huh? I don't even see anything even remotely Bob related here.
>>>>>>> Odd that you seem to.
>>>>>> Odd that Bob lives in Az. and YOU are now posting here, instead of your 
>>>>>> usual gig in AFBL.
>>>>>>
>>>>> 	Odd that I'm reading and posting from ia.talk.misc.  I don't
>>>>> check AFBL all that much anymore.  Once a week is the norm, unless
>>>>> something exciting catches me.
>>>> Odd that so MANY of your posts are there:
>>> 	Odd that you dishonestly failed to mention that the bulk were
>>> cross posts from misc.legal.  In fact, when one clicks on my name, one
>>> finds only ONE post that wasn't made from misc.legal in the first
>>> list. 
>> I don;t care how many OTHER groups were on the x-post list, you were 
>> primarily posting about BOB!
>>
> 
> 	Not so.  The Trusted Bible thread has 


Kent, you have been BUSTED!

You ARE and have BEEN an AFBL mainstay!



>>> 	The next most recent AFBL post listed is for Feb. 4.
>>> 	Now quite what one would expect for an obsessed person.
>> Squirm worm, it's your record on display:
> 
> 	And those who wish to do so can see for themselves that very
> few posts are about Lar$on.  He's not the issue he once was.

Obssessor tries to squirm out.

>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/about?hl=en
>>>>
>>>> This month's top posters
>>>> 65 	  	for...@it.com
>>>> 63 	  	compu...@gmail.com (kent)
>>>>
>>>> All time top posters
>>>> 7597 	  	jacob...@pacbell.net
>>>> 5505 	  	Range...@concentric.net
>>>> 5109 	  	j...@thecodezone.com
>>>> 2895 	  	compu...@gmail.com (kent)
>>>>
>>>>>>>> your opinions have proven to be little more 
>>>>>>>> than revisionist slime from the get go.
>>>>>>> 	I post the truth.  You don't have to like it, but you do have
>>>>>>> to accept it.
>>>>>> You wouldn't know the truth if it walked up and bit you in the ass.
>>>>> 	Projection transference noted.
>>>> Psychobabble bullshit noted.
>>> 	It's called truth.  
>> You have none to offer, never do.
> 
> 	Projection is a bad thing, Sam.

So why do you?

>>>>>>> 	And what do you have against LEGAL immigration?
>>>>>> Nothing at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>> 	You must,
>>>> You lie again, as per always.
>>> 	You took a contrary position to Just Cocky, and his position
>>> has consistently been PRO legal immigration.
>> Mine is not against it either.
> 
> 	Then explain why you took 

Then quote where I did, assfuck.

>>>>> since you have taken a position contrary to Just
>>>>> Cocky and me.  We are very much PRO legal immigration.
>>>> Of course you are, it's how YOU got here isn't it?
>>> 	It's how *I* got here.  I don't know the circumstances of Just
>>> Cocky.  He may have been born in the U.S.
>> And we need more responsive quotas and standards - that's my position.
>>
>> What say you?
> 
> 	I say it's far too difficult as it is. 


You mean you agree with me, or disagree, or what?

You want a revolving door with no standards?

Stupid piece of Iowa shit.

>>>>>>> The tone of
>>>>>>> your posts gives me the impression that you are against it.  If I have
>>>>>>> your position wrong, I apologize.  If I have it correct, please
>>>>>>> explain why LEGAL immigration is bad.
>>>>>> LEGAL immigration could be better if we had a more responsive quota 
>>>>>> allocation based on real world skills needs in the US.
>>>>> 	Since legal immigration is what Just Cocky has been promoting,
>>>>> please explain the beef you have with him.
>>>> Since I just explained my position, explain what beef YOU have with it!
>>> 	As I've stated, I'm very much PRO legal immigration.  I
>>> encourage anyone who wishes to come here to do so, but to do so
>>> LEGALLY.  Just Cocky has taken the same position.  As such, I can not
>>> have a beef with his position.
>> I don't want just "anyone".
>>
>> I want people whose work skills and desires make them GOOD candidates.
>>
> 
> 	When I arrived here I had no real skills.


Seems that hasn't changed much.