Article View: iol.support.modems
Article #5Re: Windows95
From: Kevin Davis
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 1996 11:00
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 1996 11:00
33 lines
1469 bytes
1469 bytes
"Trevor W. Gray BA,BAI,MIEI." <tgray@iol.ie> wrote: >rclapham@hibernia.ie (Robin D Clapham) wrote: >> >> Windows 95 sends two seperate "at" commands >> (about 2/100 sec apart) >> the default and the extra settings (as user defined):- >> i.e. in my case:- >> >> Windows 95 default >> Send: AT S7=30 S30=180 LM1 &Q5 \N4 %C3 &K3 BN1 X4<cr> >> >> Additional init >> Send: AT &f2 n1 w2 &c1 &d1 &k3 &q5 \n3 %c1 %e1 s7=60 s36=7 s48=7<cr> >> >> >> DOES THE SECOND OVER RIDE THE FIRST OR JUST ADD TO IT >> CHANGING ONLY THE CONFLICTING COMMANDS >> i.e. %c1 to %c3 >Who cares! >Serves you right for using Windows 95 >Should've stuck with Win311 Well now, you're real helpful aren't you? To address the issue, it is just like issuing two at commands, whatever commands are duplicated, the second one will override. You can either manually take control by using the "Extra Settings" field or you can hack away at the registry to manually modify the at commands. Obviously the first choice is eaiser.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4cqtg0$dji@ddi2.digital.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ddi2.digital.net!usenetReferences:
<4ach83$e36@barnacle.iol.ie> <4cqadr$f31@barnacle.iol.ie>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ddi2.digital.net!usenet From: kdavis@digital.net (Kevin Davis) Newsgroups: iol.support.modems,comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: Windows95 Date: Mon, 08 Jan 1996 11:00:54 GMT Organization: Pseudo-Sloth Message-ID: <4cqtg0$dji@ddi2.digital.net> References: <4ach83$e36@barnacle.iol.ie> <4cqadr$f31@barnacle.iol.ie> Reply-To: kdavis@digital.net NNTP-Posting-Host: @pm2_27.digital.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82