Article View: iol.support.modems
Article #7Re: Windows95
From: Trevor W. Gray BA,BAI,MIEI.
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 1996 22:56
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 1996 22:56
21 lines
1515 bytes
1515 bytes
ofarrwrk@iol.ie (Rory O'Farrell) wrote: > > Robin, we can have our revenge by biding our time... When he migrates > to Win95, we'll remember :-) > Given that it looks like WindowsNT will be the natural successor to Windows 3.11 in the business world, I think you can rest assured that I'll be waiting for, if not the new version of WindowsNT, then the NT/95 successor before I upgrade me or my customers. Okay, Okay, just to show that I'm not all bad, I will admit that there is one little teeny weeny thing that would tempt me, namely MS Access95 has a few very neat new features, unfortunately there are just too many problems with W95 on networks, not to mention the cost, that restrict me from moving until the whole thing is stable and compatible enough to allow me to upgrade several 25+ user networks as well as me, and I can't see that happening until at least the NT/95 successor arrives. In the meantime, you guys enjoy Win95, I'll just keep developing with Access under 3.11, and at least all my networks will continue to work.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4cs7f6$ll0@barnacle.iol.ie>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!iol!usenetReferences:
<4ach83$e36@barnacle.iol.ie> <4cqadr$f31@barnacle.iol.ie> <4crk6h$j5a@barnacle.iol.ie> <4crq2k$jsj@barnacle.iol.ie>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!iol!usenet From: "Trevor W. Gray BA,BAI,MIEI." <tgray@iol.ie> Newsgroups: iol.support.modems,comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: Windows95 Date: 8 Jan 1996 22:56:38 GMT Organization: Ireland On-Line Message-ID: <4cs7f6$ll0@barnacle.iol.ie> References: <4ach83$e36@barnacle.iol.ie> <4cqadr$f31@barnacle.iol.ie> <4crk6h$j5a@barnacle.iol.ie> <4crq2k$jsj@barnacle.iol.ie> NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup-137.dublin.iol.ie