Re: porcacccc....

Article View: it.test

Article #173970

#173970

From: orpheus
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:04

15 lines
1906 bytes

Fandango wrote:
> orpheus ha spiegato il 29/11/2009 :
>
>> ma allora Chrome e similia dovrebbero ottenere
>> anche un punteggio migliore
>> adesso provo
>
> oppure peggiore

leggermente migliore, ma poca roba
Download:
3082 kbit/s � 385 kbyte/s
Upload:
353 kbit/s � 44 kbyte/s
Latenza: 82.625 ms

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4b127f86$0$6842$5fc30a8@news.tiscali.it>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!draco.tiscalinet.it!news-f1.tiscali.it!not-for-mail

References:

<mn.eb527d9b9bf8d90d.99143@supapelx.invalid> <1v3wjw7d645y0$.dlg@SiM.invalid> <mn.eb5c7d9b609d5210.99143@supapelx.invalid> <mn.eb607d9bb06ed0c0.99143@supapelx.invalid> <6adv3pkw0vaq.dlg@SiM.invalid> <4b127828$0$709$5fc30a8@news.tiscali.it> <1hmkhh86124ta.dlg@SiM.invalid> <mn.eb717d9bf35e57f0.99143@supapelx.invalid> <1k6zstu2a5607$.dlg@SiM.invalid> <mn.eb787d9b9bd7c6ef.99143@supapelx.invalid> <mn.eb797d9b8e9ea1cc.99143@supapelx.invalid> <15fr64q374yrl$.dlg@SiM.invalid> <mn.eb7c7d9b671ba578.99143@supapelx.invalid> <1hq5wkh22j8e8.dlg@SiM.invalid> <mn.eb827d9ba1c4229b.99143@supapelx.invalid> <4b127edc$0$703$5fc30a8@news.tiscali.it> <mn.eb867d9b0f0875ad.99143@supapelx.invalid>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ITALIAN,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!draco.tiscalinet.it!news-f1.tiscali.it!not-for-mail
From: "orpheus" <CAPPELLOharrymail@TOGLILOemail.it>
Newsgroups: it.test
References: <mn.eb527d9b9bf8d90d.99143@supapelx.invalid> <1v3wjw7d645y0$.dlg@SiM.invalid> <mn.eb5c7d9b609d5210.99143@supapelx.invalid> <mn.eb607d9bb06ed0c0.99143@supapelx.invalid> <6adv3pkw0vaq.dlg@SiM.invalid> <4b127828$0$709$5fc30a8@news.tiscali.it> <1hmkhh86124ta.dlg@SiM.invalid> <mn.eb717d9bf35e57f0.99143@supapelx.invalid> <1k6zstu2a5607$.dlg@SiM.invalid> <mn.eb787d9b9bd7c6ef.99143@supapelx.invalid> <mn.eb797d9b8e9ea1cc.99143@supapelx.invalid> <15fr64q374yrl$.dlg@SiM.invalid> <mn.eb7c7d9b671ba578.99143@supapelx.invalid> <1hq5wkh22j8e8.dlg@SiM.invalid> <mn.eb827d9ba1c4229b.99143@supapelx.invalid> <4b127edc$0$703$5fc30a8@news.tiscali.it> <mn.eb867d9b0f0875ad.99143@supapelx.invalid>
Subject: Re: porcacccc....
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:04:44 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 format=flowed;
 charset="ISO-8859-15";
 reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <4b127f86$0$6842$5fc30a8@news.tiscali.it>
Organization: Tiscali SpA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.223.93.167
X-Trace: 1259503494 news.tiscali.it 6842 84.223.93.167:2475
X-Complaints-To: abuse@tiscali.it

Reply to Parent Message