Article View: k12.ed.tech
Article #264Re: Amateur Radio in Tech. Classes
From: Alan Beck
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1992 08:29
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1992 08:29
59 lines
3113 bytes
3113 bytes
-=> Quoting Lowell Herr to Alan Beck <=- LH> Do you know if the licensed operator needs to be present at all times LH> when the system is operating or can the system just remain operating LH> with "no one at the controls?" LH> Lowell Lowell, This is an area which is under scrutiny at this moment. Currently the answer is no. But, there are proposals in the works for stations in the states to be able to leave thier Packet BBSes in "unattended" mode when they are operating on certian, pre-determined frequencies. I believe the International Telecommunicat ions union is looking into it. Here in Canada, there are no rules on that, so I just leave mine running all of the time. The F6FBB package which I am running is a very nice one, but it is hard to set up and a pain when it requires any work, but the users are able to do lots with it. I think you should try to contact a Ham Club and go out to a few meetings. A ham ticket is not that hard to get and once you have it, you have it. The only real difference bettween Canada and you is that the FCC will take it away from you if you misbehave, here they slap you on the wrist about 3 times, then they fine you. People go to jail in the states. Well, Best 73 for now, I hope I was some help. Alan P.S. I was not trying to make your country sound mean, I was just telling it like it is. Your FCC has been known to confiscate radios from misbehaving operators at Ham Radio Conventions, in some ways, I think it is great because then people are not as likely to Jam other operators. I have been openly sworn at in the most vulgar of language, just for using my radio, by another unidentified operator, for no reason. But, our DOC says they will do nothing because they do not have the man-power to investigate. whoops, sorry, have to be gender consious, they don't have the "people-power" to investigate. Oh yea, I am very impressed by the turn-around times for our mail. On Shortwave, the propagation has been very bad due to a severe solar flare, since I live in the sub-arctic (latitude 62.41 deg north) I have alot of Aurora Borealis, nice to look at, but it takes out shortwave communications. So, I am working on setting up a Microsat Gateway to UO-22 and then I can send my mail via a Low Earth orbit satellite and I won't have to worry too much what the sun does. Best Regards for now. Alan ... My other vehicle is a Galaxy Class Starship ... -- uucp: uunet!m2xenix!puddle!3402!30.0!Alan.Beck Internet: Alan.Beck@p0.f30.n3402.z1.fidonet.org
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<17404.2AFE7DE8@puddle.fidonet.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!newsflash.concordia.ca!sifon!charnel!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!caen!m2xenix!puddle!p0.f30.n3402.z1.fidonet.org!Alan.BeckShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!newsflash.concordia.ca!sifon!charnel!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!caen!m2xenix!puddle!p0.f30.n3402.z1.fidonet.org!Alan.Beck From: Alan.Beck@p0.f30.n3402.z1.fidonet.org (Alan Beck) Newsgroups: k12.ed.tech Subject: Re: Amateur Radio in Tech. Classes Message-ID: <17404.2AFE7DE8@puddle.fidonet.org> Date: 8 Nov 92 08:29:00 GMT Sender: ufgate@puddle.fidonet.org (newsout1.26) Organization: FidoNet node 1:3402/30.0 - The Really Board, Yellowknife NWT Lines: 59