Thread View: k12.sys.channel9
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Nancy Petersen
Thu, 15 Oct 1992 21:37
Moore; dist.ed.theory
Author: Nancy Petersen
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 21:37
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 21:37
50 lines
3021 bytes
3021 bytes
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 19:27:00 -0400 From: <N0G@psuvm.psu.edu> Subject: Re: Moore;dist.ed.theory To: KWB107@psuvm.psu.edu Cc: banthy-m@acs.ucalgary.ca In-Reply-To: KWB107 AT PSUVM.PSU.EDU Wed, 14 Oct 1992 16:39:00 -0400 You ask "elaborate on your perceived differences between the two" and I think you mean by "the two" the educational theory as opposed to what you call a scientific theory... I dont accept, for the moment, the proposition that educational theory should be "looser" than some other kind of theory called "Scientific". Should be.. I said.. I recognize that at present most educational theories are less well grounded in empirical data. It is a chicken and egg problem isnt it... We have no well accepted summaries of knowledge about distance learning and teaching. Therefore people gather information that is a-theoretical... it neither refutes or confirms any theory.. some distance teaching universities sweep up mountains of facts that do little to advance knowledge in general... they know how many men or women there are in each region, how old they are, their grades, etc.. all useful to plan the system, but of no contribution to development of basic understanding about how people learn and teach... So we have theories with weak foundations in fact, and facts unrelated to theories.... I hope this discussion will help break us out of this circle... ... we can be more scientific, without yet reaching the stage of being able to test hypotheses in experimental design..I personally think the experimental method is an important and the most sophisticated form or research.. and I also like qualitative, ethnographic and other inductive research... I dont think we are ready yet for much hypothetico-deductive research... but we should aspire to it.. in other words we might be "looser" and not what you call scientific now... but we can get less loose if we applied discipline in our qualitative methods, aspire and seek ways of testing by experiment... and build research from our theories.. and seek to developo them in light of the information we discover... I dont know if this is answering your question... anyway I am more interested in hearing what other people think... I would like to get some consensus views on these issues to take forward to Bangkok... so let's hear from you.... Michael Moore. -- uucp: uunet!m2xenix!puddle!23.0!Nancy.Petersen Internet: Nancy.Petersen@p0.f23.n105.z1.fidonet.org
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads