Article View: kw.general
Article #198Re: Macleans Survey
From: Peter Vanderheyden
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 1995 00:00
16 lines
1499 bytes
1499 bytes
In article <DIByA7.8F@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>, Joseph Yang <j3yang@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> wrote: >Grades within the university cannot be compared with grades at other >unis.. maybe Carleton profs mark easier... My psych prof told us that in >the UofT psych department, if the class average is higher than 70% the >prof has to speak to the dean to explain why. BTW, my understanding of this policy is that it only applies to large classes, and the prof may need to speak to the chair (not the dean) if the class average is much below or above a 70% or so. Basically, if the class is big enough, the grades should fall on a normal curve. But I agree, higher grades don't necessarily mean better students. In general, grades are not a great way to compare students' abilities. - Peter
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<495el7$6c3@glinda.asel.udel.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<DI900L.8DF@info.uucp> <DI9HLJ.47q@freenet.carleton.ca> <DI9Jsr.AAz@cunews.carleton.ca> <DIByA7.8F@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 108225,8a2146d7d5dd0c6d X-Google-Attributes: gid108225,public X-Google-Thread: fb191,8a2146d7d5dd0c6d X-Google-Attributes: gidfb191,public X-Google-Thread: 10f6dc,8a2146d7d5dd0c6d X-Google-Attributes: gid10f6dc,public From: vanderhe@glinda.asel.udel.edu (Peter Vanderheyden) Subject: Re: Macleans Survey Date: 1995/11/24 Message-ID: <495el7$6c3@glinda.asel.udel.edu> X-Deja-AN: 120090503 references: <DI900L.8DF@info.uucp> <DI9HLJ.47q@freenet.carleton.ca> <DI9Jsr.AAz@cunews.carleton.ca> <DIByA7.8F@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> organization: AI duPont Institute newsgroups: kw.general,uw.general,carleton.general