Article View: la.eats
Article #196Re: Why Rusty Pelican?
From: Nancy Feagans
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 22:43
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 22:43
40 lines
2677 bytes
2677 bytes
In article <1992Dec18.182054.16156@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> alan@elroy.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Alan S. Mazer) writes: >My fiancee and I had an interesting experience which perhaps someone could >shed some light on. > >Just for the heck of it, we went to a Rusty Pelican. Never been there >before. Had a long wait, on a Sunday night. The restaurant was packed to >the gills. But the service was slow and just poor. They took forever with >everything, ignoring empty water glasses and waiting 10-15 minutes to fill >them once we asked for more. The calamari appetizer was battered to the >point that you couldn't taste much. Champagne (it was a special occasion, >her birthday) was okay, but overpriced. Clam chowder (a favorite of mine) >had very little flavor or clams. Steak was tough and without flavor. (I >should have been clued in by the fact that they brought me A1 sauce.) Did we >just hit this place on a bad night or is it always like this, and if the >latter, why is there such a wait for a table? For the money ($50?) there are >other places we could have gone for a much better dinner. > >On the positive side, we also just went to Dodsworth in Pasadena. Food was >good and the service wonderful. Hadn't been there in several years. -- Alan: Was this the RP off the 2 fwy near the 134? If so, I had a bad dining experience there also. I had a *very*marginal Ahi - I think it was called "Ruby Red" or some such. It seemed ok, but before we left the place I had some pretty severe gastro-intestinal distress. The other members of the party (6 of us) said their food was just ok; no one became ill as far as I know. Our service was good, but the waiter was really hustling. Like you, it is a pet peeve of mine when I spend big bucks for a dinner and it takes an act of God to get a refill. I wish I'd brought a canteen :-) I'd eaten at that particular RP only one other time, and the food seemed better. Maybe it's this particular one of the chain that's bad? -- Nancy J. Feagans (818) 306-6423 Jet Propulsion Lab nancy@jpl-devvax.Jpl.Nasa.Gov "Not a shred of evidence exists in favor of the idea that life is serious."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec18.224349.18281@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ufo!hayduke!nancyReferences:
<1992Dec18.182054.16156@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: la.eats Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ufo!hayduke!nancy From: nancy@hayduke (Nancy Feagans) Subject: Re: Why Rusty Pelican? Message-ID: <1992Dec18.224349.18281@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov> Sender: usenet@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov (For NNTP so rrn will be able to post) Nntp-Posting-Host: hayduke Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA) References: <1992Dec18.182054.16156@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> Distribution: la Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 22:43:49 GMT Lines: 40