🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: la.eats
Article #355

Re: Dial "I-800-Gestapo"

#355
From: George Grapman
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:48
71 lines
4453 bytes
D. Stussy wrote:
> "Golden California Girls" <GldnCAGrls@aol.com.mil> wrote in message
> news:XqmdnRiqY_svrfLanZ2dnUVZ_qainZ2d@championbroadband.com...
>> In LA.EATS D. Stussy wrote:
>>> "Golden California Girls" <GldnCAGrls@aol.com.mil> wrote in message
>>> news:MeSdnaHPoOO4C_PanZ2dnUVZ_rWtnZ2d@championbroadband.com...
>>>> In BA.FOOD Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>>>> Drivers who see someone who appears to be
>>>>> operating a vehicle under the influence of
>>>>> alcohol or other substances can call (800) TELL-CHP,
>>>>> said Officer Todd Workman of the CHP
>>>>>
>>>> Me thinks someone needs more days in lockup to think about their last
> DUI
>>> so
>>>> they understand why they were put in a cage in the first place.  Too
> bad
>>> their
>>>> DL can't have a big red "DUI" stamped over it so they can't buy booze
>>> anymore.
>>>
>>> Of course that will never happen.  "DUI" stamped on their driver's
> license
>>> is unconstitutional.  The 21st Amendment (repealing "prohibition")
> basically
>>> says that any citizen of the age of majority has a constitutional right
> to
>>> buy and consume alcoholic beverages.  In contrast, there is no right to
>>> operate a motor vehicle.
>> "Amendment XXI
>>
>> Section 1. The eighteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the
> United
>> States is hereby repealed.
>>
>> Section 2. The transportation or importation into any state, territory, or
>> possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of
> intoxicating
>> liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited.
>>
>> Section 3. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been
> ratified
>> as an amendment to the Constitution by conventions in the several states,
> as
>> provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the
> submission
>> hereof to the states by the Congress."
>>
>> Seems like that only laws that support the eighteenth article of amendment
> are
>> void.  So a City, County, State, or the Federal Government is free to make
> it
>> illegal to drink in your front yard, on the beach or even be out in public
> under
>> the influence, never mind drive a car or tax it.
>>
>> Now a convicted criminal has forfeit their constitutional rights.  So a
> big red
>> DUI stamp would be legal.  As would a law prohibiting anyone selling to
> such a
>> person.
> 
> Tell me this:  With the 18th, which prohibited alcohol, being repealed, it
> is clear (by conclusion) that there IS a right to drink.  Furthermre, via
> the 10th, a state or local government has NO RIGHT TO REGULATE as via the
> constitutional amendments, the U.S. Government has reserved that right to
> itself.  Section 2 is a bit redundant but makes that clear.
> 
> 
   Article 2 of the 21st Amendment allows each state the right to ban 
alcohol.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <jpRbj.34687$Pv2.16985@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr23.news.prodigy.net.POSTED!239afff0!not-for-mail
References: <e386222281af27392924126ef6e65e19@dizum.com> <MeSdnaHPoOO4C_PanZ2dnUVZ_rWtnZ2d@championbroadband.com> <fkmnei$o00$1@snarked.org> <XqmdnRiqY_svrfLanZ2dnUVZ_qainZ2d@championbroadband.com> <fkngfi$qjl$1@snarked.org>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 115ce9,5ac5e66bfaad4447
X-Google-Thread: fe8e7,5ac5e66bfaad4447
X-Google-Thread: ffe14,5ac5e66bfaad4447
X-Google-Attributes: gid115ce9,gidfe8e7,gidffe14,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr23.news.prodigy.net.POSTED!239afff0!not-for-mail
From: George Grapman <sfgeorge@paccbell.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: la.eats,ba.food,alt.activism
Subject: Re: Dial "I-800-Gestapo"
References: <e386222281af27392924126ef6e65e19@dizum.com> <MeSdnaHPoOO4C_PanZ2dnUVZ_rWtnZ2d@championbroadband.com> <fkmnei$o00$1@snarked.org> <XqmdnRiqY_svrfLanZ2dnUVZ_qainZ2d@championbroadband.com> <fkngfi$qjl$1@snarked.org>
In-Reply-To: <fkngfi$qjl$1@snarked.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 71
Message-ID: <jpRbj.34687$Pv2.16985@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.141.89.53
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net
X-Trace: newssvr23.news.prodigy.net 1198514895 ST000 71.141.89.53 (Mon, 24 Dec 2007 11:48:15 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 11:48:15 EST
Organization: AT&T http://yahoo.sbc.com
X-UserInfo1: Q[OUC][EPZUWSU\YNCOF_W\@PJ_^PBQLGPQRJVMHQAVTUZ]CLNTCPFK[WDXDHV[K^FCGJCJLPF_D_NCC@FUG^Q\DINVAXSLIFXYJSSCCALP@PB@\OS@BITWAH\CQZKJMMD^SJA^NXA\GVLSRBD^M_NW_F[YLVTWIGAXAQBOATKBBQRXECDFDMQ\DZFUE@\JM
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 08:48:15 -0800