🚀 go-pugleaf

"Golden California Girls" <GldnCAGrls@aol.com.mil> wrote in message
news:vfWdnWw_-thzbPLanZ2dnUVZ_tTinZ2d@championbroadband.com...
> D. Stussy wrote:
> > "Golden California Girls" <GldnCAGrls@aol.com.mil> wrote in message
> > news:XqmdnRiqY_svrfLanZ2dnUVZ_qainZ2d@championbroadband.com...
> >> In LA.EATS D. Stussy wrote:
> >>> "Golden California Girls" <GldnCAGrls@aol.com.mil> wrote in message
> >>> news:MeSdnaHPoOO4C_PanZ2dnUVZ_rWtnZ2d@championbroadband.com...
> >>>> In BA.FOOD Nomen Nescio wrote:
> >>>>> Drivers who see someone who appears to be
> >>>>> operating a vehicle under the influence of
> >>>>> alcohol or other substances can call (800) TELL-CHP,
> >>>>> said Officer Todd Workman of the CHP
> >>>>>
> >>>> Me thinks someone needs more days in lockup to think about their last
> > DUI
> >>> so
> >>>> they understand why they were put in a cage in the first place.  Too
> > bad
> >>> their
> >>>> DL can't have a big red "DUI" stamped over it so they can't buy booze
> >>> anymore.
> >>>
> >>> Of course that will never happen.  "DUI" stamped on their driver's
> > license
> >>> is unconstitutional.  The 21st Amendment (repealing "prohibition")
> > basically
> >>> says that any citizen of the age of majority has a constitutional
right
> > to
> >>> buy and consume alcoholic beverages.  In contrast, there is no right
to
> >>> operate a motor vehicle.
> >> "Amendment XXI
> >>
> >> Section 1. The eighteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of
the
> > United
> >> States is hereby repealed.
> >>
> >> Section 2. The transportation or importation into any state, territory,
or
> >> possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of
> > intoxicating
> >> liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited.
> >>
> >> Section 3. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been
> > ratified
> >> as an amendment to the Constitution by conventions in the several
states,
> > as
> >> provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the
> > submission
> >> hereof to the states by the Congress."
> >>
> >> Seems like that only laws that support the eighteenth article of
amendment
> > are
> >> void.  So a City, County, State, or the Federal Government is free to
make
> > it
> >> illegal to drink in your front yard, on the beach or even be out in
public
> > under
> >> the influence, never mind drive a car or tax it.
> >>
> >> Now a convicted criminal has forfeit their constitutional rights.  So a
> > big red
> >> DUI stamp would be legal.  As would a law prohibiting anyone selling to
> > such a
> >> person.
> >
> > Tell me this:  With the 18th, which prohibited alcohol, being repealed,
it
> > is clear (by conclusion) that there IS a right to drink.  Furthermre,
via
> > the 10th, a state or local government has NO RIGHT TO REGULATE as via
the
> > constitutional amendments, the U.S. Government has reserved that right
to
> > itself.  Section 2 is a bit redundant but makes that clear.
>
> Do you know what the interstate commerce clause is?  Can you see how it
could
> apply to booze?  If you can't spend some time in law school, until you
can.

The 21st talks about more than transportation across state lines.