Article View: la.general
Article #1667Re: 710 Freeway suit
From: Richard Moeur
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 00:00
60 lines
3084 bytes
3084 bytes
Ron Newman wrote: > This is South Pasadena's decision. Nobody should be forcing them > to destroy their community for the benefit of others. While local governments may believe, act, and in some cases be sovereign entities, accountable only to the citizens within their borders, if they act without regard for their neighbor communities, everyone loses - including them. In most metropolitan areas, there is a local council of governments, set up by the Feds to jointly administer planning, air quality, and other issues/programs which affect all the communities in a given region. From my experience watching some of these COGs in action, a city which acts in complete disregard of its neighbors often ends up on the short end of the stick, due to the other cities' retribution in the COG process by diverting funds, delaying projects, and other acts. One beneficial aspect of COGs is that they force the local communities to at least meet each other as equals on technical issues, outside (hopefully) of the 'border war' attitude seen so often these days in urban regions. As to the question "Is it fair?" - that depends on who you ask. What's fair for the greater community may not be as fair for the smaller community. My point is: a community can act in any way it pleases within the law; however, it should be prepared to face the outside consequences of its actions. P.S.: I drove the 710 corridor last week when I was in the area, so at least I could see the area being affected. The one thing that struck me - there seemed to be a big demographic shift once you cross Alhambra Rd. - I can see how there might be a difference of opinion between the two communities on many issues, including this one. -- Richard C. Moeur, P.E., N7WTB, E.C.I., whatever... Practicing Traffic Engineer (I'll get it right someday...) Phoenix, Arizona, USA "Life is just one W1-5 after another, until the W14-1" The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the Arizona Department of Transportation. Really. Now Open!: http://members.aol.com/rcmoeur :9
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<326BA46C.77C@earthlink.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<markscha-0110962313000001@ts38-9.wla.ts.ucla.edu> <01bbbc8c$786a5b20$33ec93cf@stalemate> <5476kc$dnv@bogus.cts.com> <32692CDD.6D39@uclink4.berkeley.edu> <54e894$6v0@shell1.cybercom.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 104eff,a3fa844df4dc0fbd X-Google-Attributes: gid104eff,public X-Google-Thread: f7890,1c921eb16bb9851e X-Google-Attributes: gidf7890,public X-Google-Thread: 107d03,a3fa844df4dc0fbd X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public X-Google-Thread: 10001a,a3fa844df4dc0fbd X-Google-Attributes: gid10001a,public From: Richard Moeur <rcmoeur@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: 710 Freeway suit Date: 1996/10/21 Message-ID: <326BA46C.77C@earthlink.net> X-Deja-AN: 190989535 references: <markscha-0110962313000001@ts38-9.wla.ts.ucla.edu> <01bbbc8c$786a5b20$33ec93cf@stalemate> <5476kc$dnv@bogus.cts.com> <32692CDD.6D39@uclink4.berkeley.edu> <54e894$6v0@shell1.cybercom.net> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Earthlink Network, Inc. mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: rcmoeur@aol.com newsgroups: la.general,ca.politics,ca.driving,misc.transport.road x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; U; 68K)