🚀 go-pugleaf

Danny Low (dlow@ppg01.sc.hp.com) wrote:
: Sarah Malain (jersar@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
: : My only source is my primary pamphlet and my main beef with the 
: : initiative is that the insurance companies want it real bad--
: : nothing an insurance company really, really wants can be good
: : for the rest of us.  That's just paranoia, but you know what they
: : say about that.

: According to the SJ Mercury News article the insurance companies
: are NEUTRAL on prop 200. 

Guess what!  No-fault coverage doesn't add anything to the health 
insurance coverage you already have!  [The proposal of Prop 200 doesn't 
cover diddly and there's no compensation for pain and suffering or even 
hassle and inconvenience.]  The insurance companies know that 
there will be no point in buying this no-fault insurance, and sooner or 
later public pressure will mean the end of mandatory insurance (since 
there will be no more people burned by uninsured motorists)!  So no more 
auto insurance revenues....