🚀 go-pugleaf

In <msadamsDMupqu.374@netcom.com> msadams@netcom.com (Michael Adams)
writes: 
I pay $2200 a year for car insurance in Los Angeles,
>with no tickets or accidents on my record. 

That's alot of money if your a Prop.103 "good driver" with a preferred
insurance company. If your into finding out if that's the best deal for
your situation (politics aside), visit my web site called -
California's insurance paradigm - URL: http://www.hntr.com/paradigm/ -
Keep in mind, I don't want to sell you insurance, I'm just an
independent information content/provider trying to make a name for
myself with the online community.

>If you are a good driver, you are really in trouble with no-fault. 
Your 
>rates can go nowhere but UP!  Those accidents that were not your
fault, 
>like somebody rear ending you, would be paid by YOUR insurance
company.  
>If your insurance company services a larger percentage of good drivers

>that the high risk companies, they are going to have to collect more 
>money to pay for claims on not-at-fault accidents.  They are not going

>to be getting any money from the people causing the accidents.  This
is  
>just common sense.

This is a stong, well thought out point, and I'm wondering how the
insurance industry would respond. My view, is I see "good drivers"
having to pay for "not-at fault" accidents - all the time - now.  

Galen Hunter
gvhunter@ix.netcom.com