🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <nncub159gd1eeeostab3et1h557p8lmrrl@4ax.com>, gunner@lightspeed.net says...
>
>On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:07:17 +0000 (UTC), Merlin Dorfman
><dorfman@green.rahul.net> wrote:
>
>>In ca.general Gunner <gunner@lightspeed.net> wrote:
>>
>>...
>>
>>> "When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and
>>> chemical material unaccounted for. That is, at the end of the first
>>> Gulf War, we knew what he had. We knew what was destroyed in all the
>>> inspection processes and that was a lot. And then we bombed with the
>>> British for four days in 1998. We might have gotten it all; we might
>>> have gotten half of it; we might have gotten none of it. But we didn't
>>> know. So I thought it was prudent for the president to go to the U.N.
>>> and for the U.N. to say you got to let these inspectors in, and this
>>> time if you don't cooperate the penalty could be regime change, not
>>> just continued sanctions."
>>> --Bill Clinton, July 22, 2003
>>
>>     And that's exactly what happened, and Saddam did let the UN
>>inspectors back in, and they found nothing.  And the rest of the
>>world believed them, and Bush said the UN inspectors were wrong
>>and invaded, and found...nothing.  As the rest of the world (not
>>blinded by ideology) knew, the UN inspectors were right.
>>
>
>Not true Dorfy...the Iraqis played  hide and seek for years.  Perhaps
>you would care to review the timeline of the inspectors? When they
>were kicked out..then let back in, then kicked out and so forth.

As I've said before, I can't really blame Bush II for thinking
Saddam had WMD, as he was doing everything in his power to make
it unclear to the world if he had them or not.

Unlike Kim Jr., who is basically saying "Yeah, I've got nukes.
What are you gonna do about it, punk?"

Starting a war over it, that I *can* blame him for.  Especailly
a war that's been run this dumb...

FW