🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <6cgsb1lpm3tg5v4usc7b68e8kn9dd4s57s@4ax.com>,
 Lawrence Glickman <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 05:24:47 GMT, Gunner <gunner@lightspeed.net>
> wrote:
> 
> >On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 12:51:12 -0500, Lawrence Glickman
> ><Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:07:16 -0700, Robert Sturgeon
> >><rsturge@inreach.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 01:17:32 -0500, Lawrence Glickman
> >>><Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:01:07 -0700, Tim May
> >>>><timcmay@removethis.got.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>In article <d9im0l$4ch$2@blue.rahul.net>, Merlin Dorfman
> >>>>><dorfman@green.rahul.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>      The property owners will, I'm sure, be paid more than their
> >>>>>> property is worth (though of course that was not the point of 
> >>>>>> their suit).  A savings account has no value beyond its dollar
> >>>>>> price, so if the govt seizes your $5000 account and pays you $6000
> >>>>>> for it, I don't see that you have a lot of complaints coming.
> >>>>>> (Except on general principle.)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>If people choose not to sell, you point is moot.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Frankly, 40 million who think as you do ought to be dumped in pits,
> >>>>>sprayed with gasoline, and lit.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--Tim May
> >>>>
> >>>>I agree.  Most of the proletariat thinks this SCOTUS decision was a
> >>>>BAD RULING.
> >>>>
> >>>>What it does, is put corporations like Wal Mart in the driver's seat,
> >>>>and screw the little guy out of what he worked for all his life.  If
> >>>>that isn't Republicanism at it's worst, I don't know what is.  The
> >>>>*Right* has traditionally favored Big Business over the little guy,
> >>>>and that is the main reason they will n-e-v-e-r get my vote.  For
> >>>>anything.
> >>>
> >>>You must have Frank White Disease.  In case you somehow
> >>>missed it, those Evil Right Wingers are the ones who voted
> >>>YOUR way.
> >>>
> >>>>Mention has been made that it was the *liberals* of the High Court who
> >>>>voted for this, not George's boys and girls.  Well, I don't give a
> >>>>rip.
> >>>
> >>>Obviously, you don't goive a rip about the actual facts.
> >>>
> >>>>  It is another in a long series of cluster fucks that happened ON
> >>>>HIS SHIFT.
> >>>
> >>>He didn't appoint ANY of those justices, and his has NO
> >>>control over how they rule.  If he gets more justices of his
> >>>liking on the SC, the next time there will be MORE on the 4
> >>>side and FEWER on the 5 side.  This is what you claim to
> >>>want, isn't it?
> >>>
> >>>>  He has a "history" of cluster fucks happening on his
> >>>>shift.  I think they bring him entertainment.  He gets to play God, we
> >>>>get to eat shit.
> >>>
> >>>That is a bizarre reading of what actually happened.
> >>>
> >>>>His Mother, Barbara, can't bother her "beautiful mind" with the
> >>>>details of the 1,700+ American war dead, and the thousands of
> >>>>casualties that are maimed for Life.  So in the Name of Street
> >>>>Justice, we begin with the Bush Estate at Kennebunkport Main, and turn
> >>>>it into a grassy mall.
> >>>
> >>>Your hatrid of the Bushes prevents you from seeing what
> >>>actually happened in this case.  Open your eyes.  FWD is not
> >>>a permanent condition.  The cure is simple - take off your
> >>>ideological blinkers and look at the facts.
> >>
> >>As if the Patriot Act was not enough, this comes along from SCOTUS to
> >>add insult to injury.
> >>
> >>When are you going to look at what is going on?  Why the f*ck did we
> >>invade Iraq this time?  George decided it was time for a regime
> >>change.  What if he decides it is time for a regime change in China or
> >>Russia?  Get rid of this mental defective before it is too late ( Ok,
> >>it was too late a long time ago ).
> >>
> >>I suppose you won't be happy until the bastard destroys Social
> >>Security beyond all repair.  This is the WORST f*ing president in the
> >>history of the U.S. government, excepting perhaps Abraham Lincoln,
> >>IMO.  Where are Dan Quale and Al Gore when you need them.
> >>
> >>Lg
> >
> >"When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and
> >chemical material unaccounted for. That is, at the end of the first
> >Gulf War, we knew what he had. We knew what was destroyed in all the
> >inspection processes and that was a lot. And then we bombed with the
> >British for four days in 1998. We might have gotten it all; we might
> >have gotten half of it; we might have gotten none of it. But we didn't
> >know. So I thought it was prudent for the president to go to the U.N.
> >and for the U.N. to say you got to let these inspectors in, and this
> >time if you don't cooperate the penalty could be regime change, not
> >just continued sanctions."
> >--Bill Clinton, July 22, 2003
> >
> >Btw...being allowed to put 3-4% of your social security funds in a
> >private account is hardly "destroying the system"

> How much is the Republican Party paying you for being a spin doctor
> and a shill for them?  I hope it is worth it to you, and that you can
> sleep with a clear conscious at night.

Congratulations. You've completely failed to address either point he 
raised in favor of an ad hominem attack.

Well done.