🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:48:48 -0500, Lawrence Glickman
<Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:

>On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 05:24:47 GMT, Gunner <gunner@lightspeed.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 12:51:12 -0500, Lawrence Glickman
>><Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:07:16 -0700, Robert Sturgeon
>>><rsturge@inreach.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 01:17:32 -0500, Lawrence Glickman
>>>><Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:01:07 -0700, Tim May
>>>>><timcmay@removethis.got.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <d9im0l$4ch$2@blue.rahul.net>, Merlin Dorfman
>>>>>><dorfman@green.rahul.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      The property owners will, I'm sure, be paid more than their
>>>>>>> property is worth (though of course that was not the point of 
>>>>>>> their suit).  A savings account has no value beyond its dollar
>>>>>>> price, so if the govt seizes your $5000 account and pays you $6000
>>>>>>> for it, I don't see that you have a lot of complaints coming.
>>>>>>> (Except on general principle.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If people choose not to sell, you point is moot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Frankly, 40 million who think as you do ought to be dumped in pits,
>>>>>>sprayed with gasoline, and lit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>--Tim May
>>>>>
>>>>>I agree.  Most of the proletariat thinks this SCOTUS decision was a
>>>>>BAD RULING.
>>>>>
>>>>>What it does, is put corporations like Wal Mart in the driver's seat,
>>>>>and screw the little guy out of what he worked for all his life.  If
>>>>>that isn't Republicanism at it's worst, I don't know what is.  The
>>>>>*Right* has traditionally favored Big Business over the little guy,
>>>>>and that is the main reason they will n-e-v-e-r get my vote.  For
>>>>>anything.
>>>>
>>>>You must have Frank White Disease.  In case you somehow
>>>>missed it, those Evil Right Wingers are the ones who voted
>>>>YOUR way.
>>>>
>>>>>Mention has been made that it was the *liberals* of the High Court who
>>>>>voted for this, not George's boys and girls.  Well, I don't give a
>>>>>rip.
>>>>
>>>>Obviously, you don't goive a rip about the actual facts.
>>>>
>>>>>  It is another in a long series of cluster fucks that happened ON
>>>>>HIS SHIFT.
>>>>
>>>>He didn't appoint ANY of those justices, and his has NO
>>>>control over how they rule.  If he gets more justices of his
>>>>liking on the SC, the next time there will be MORE on the 4
>>>>side and FEWER on the 5 side.  This is what you claim to
>>>>want, isn't it?
>>>>
>>>>>  He has a "history" of cluster fucks happening on his
>>>>>shift.  I think they bring him entertainment.  He gets to play God, we
>>>>>get to eat shit.
>>>>
>>>>That is a bizarre reading of what actually happened.
>>>>
>>>>>His Mother, Barbara, can't bother her "beautiful mind" with the
>>>>>details of the 1,700+ American war dead, and the thousands of
>>>>>casualties that are maimed for Life.  So in the Name of Street
>>>>>Justice, we begin with the Bush Estate at Kennebunkport Main, and turn
>>>>>it into a grassy mall.
>>>>
>>>>Your hatrid of the Bushes prevents you from seeing what
>>>>actually happened in this case.  Open your eyes.  FWD is not
>>>>a permanent condition.  The cure is simple - take off your
>>>>ideological blinkers and look at the facts.
>>>
>>>As if the Patriot Act was not enough, this comes along from SCOTUS to
>>>add insult to injury.
>>>
>>>When are you going to look at what is going on?  Why the f*ck did we
>>>invade Iraq this time?  George decided it was time for a regime
>>>change.  What if he decides it is time for a regime change in China or
>>>Russia?  Get rid of this mental defective before it is too late ( Ok,
>>>it was too late a long time ago ).
>>>
>>>I suppose you won't be happy until the bastard destroys Social
>>>Security beyond all repair.  This is the WORST f*ing president in the
>>>history of the U.S. government, excepting perhaps Abraham Lincoln,
>>>IMO.  Where are Dan Quale and Al Gore when you need them.
>>>
>>>Lg
>>
>>"When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and
>>chemical material unaccounted for. That is, at the end of the first
>>Gulf War, we knew what he had. We knew what was destroyed in all the
>>inspection processes and that was a lot. And then we bombed with the
>>British for four days in 1998. We might have gotten it all; we might
>>have gotten half of it; we might have gotten none of it. But we didn't
>>know. So I thought it was prudent for the president to go to the U.N.
>>and for the U.N. to say you got to let these inspectors in, and this
>>time if you don't cooperate the penalty could be regime change, not
>>just continued sanctions."
>>--Bill Clinton, July 22, 2003
>>
>>Btw...being allowed to put 3-4% of your social security funds in a
>>private account is hardly "destroying the system"
>>
>>Gunner
>
>How much is the Republican Party paying you for being a spin doctor
>and a shill for them?  I hope it is worth it to you, and that you can
>sleep with a clear conscious at night.
>
>Lg

Actually..I send Them money. And I sleep the sleep of the just.

Gunner

"Considering the events of recent years, 
 the world has a long way to go to regain
 its credibility and reputation with the US."
                                 unknown