🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <60ksb119dmp8p22cgjj1fa3e0kmigvpmc7@4ax.com>,
 Lawrence Glickman <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 02:28:30 -0400, BTR1701 <btr1702@ix.netcom.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >> >"When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and
> >> >chemical material unaccounted for. That is, at the end of the first
> >> >Gulf War, we knew what he had. We knew what was destroyed in all the
> >> >inspection processes and that was a lot. And then we bombed with the
> >> >British for four days in 1998. We might have gotten it all; we might
> >> >have gotten half of it; we might have gotten none of it. But we didn't
> >> >know. So I thought it was prudent for the president to go to the U.N.
> >> >and for the U.N. to say you got to let these inspectors in, and this
> >> >time if you don't cooperate the penalty could be regime change, not
> >> >just continued sanctions."
> >> >--Bill Clinton, July 22, 2003
> >> >
> >> >Btw...being allowed to put 3-4% of your social security funds in a
> >> >private account is hardly "destroying the system"
> >
> >> How much is the Republican Party paying you for being a spin doctor
> >> and a shill for them?  I hope it is worth it to you, and that you can
> >> sleep with a clear conscious at night.
> >
> >Congratulations. You've completely failed to address either point he 
> >raised in favor of an ad hominem attack.
> >
> >Well done.
> 
> I've addressed this BEFORE you joined the n/g, but I guess I have to
> go over it again for the newcomers.

I've been in this ng for years and since I was the one that started this 
thread, you're the newcomer here. I don't know who it was that added all 
the other cross-posts but this thread was originally only posted to one 
group: alt.tv.the-west-wing

> HANS BLIX said there was ZERO EVIDENCE of Uranium Enrichment equipment
> in Iraq when he and his TEAM performed multiple inspections.  Nothing
> was found after Gulf War One.  Zip and nada.

And yet even the hero of the left, Bill Clinton, thought otherwise.

> Does that stop GWB?  Hell no.  He sends in his hit teams and the game
> is on.  When do you think it will end?  I will tell you...when we
> LEAVE IRAQ.  There are more insurgents in Iraq today than when
> Operation Iraqi Freedom BEGAN.  We're LOSING.  Time to pack it in,
> pack it up, and bring the Armed Forces home.
> 
> Is that clear?
> Do you need further documentation?

How does all that Iraq crap translate to four LIBERAL justices voting 
against individual property rights in the latest Supreme Court decision? 
How does all that Iraq crap, even if true, make that decision Bush's 
fault?

> And regarding Social Security, don't DARE fuck with the money I put
> into my account since I was 16 years of age.  I need this to live on.

Well, it's hardly Bush's fault that you haven't prepared for your own 
retirement and have relied on the government to do it for you. Social 
Security was never meant to be anyone's sole source of income after 
retirement.

But nevertheless, how does all this Social Security crap translate to 
four LIBERAL justices voting against individual property rights in the 
latest Supreme Court decision? How does all,this Social Security crap 
even if true, make that decision Bush's fault?